Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35986344›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2022

Protocol: evaluation of an optimised couples-focused intervention to increase testing for HIV in rural KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa, the Igugu Lethu ('Our treasure') cohort study.

Nuala McGrath, Nathi Ngcobo, Zhixin Feng, Phillip Joseph, Pumla Dladla, Thulani Ngubane, Victoria Hosegood, Katherine Morton, Heidi Van Rooyen, Alastair Van Heerden

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Nuala McGrathCHERISH programme, School of Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK. N.McGrath@soton.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-1039-0159
Nathi NgcoboClinical HIV Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Zhixin FengSchool of Geography and Planning, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Phillip JosephHuman Sciences Research Council, Sweetwaters, Pietermaritzburg, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.
Pumla DladlaHuman Sciences Research Council, Sweetwaters, Pietermaritzburg, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.
Thulani NgubaneHuman Sciences Research Council, Sweetwaters, Pietermaritzburg, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.
Victoria HosegoodDepartment of Social Statistics & Demography, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Katherine MortonSchool of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Heidi Van RooyenHuman Sciences Research Council, Sweetwaters, Pietermaritzburg, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.
Alastair Van HeerdenHuman Sciences Research Council, Sweetwaters, Pietermaritzburg, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.
Human Sciences Research Council · ZAUniversity of Southampton · GBSun Yat-sen University · CNUniversity of the Witwatersrand · ZA

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBetween 2012 and 2015, the Uthando Lwethu (UL) study demonstrated that a theory-based behavioural couples-focused intervention significantly increased participation in couples HIV testing and counselling (CHTC) among South African couples who had never previously tested for HIV together or mutually disclosed their HIV status, 42% compared to 12% of the control group at 9 months follow-up. Although effective, we were nonetheless concerned that in this high prevalence setting the majority (58%) of intervention couples chose not to test together. In response we optimised the UL intervention and in a new study, 'Igugu Lethu', we are evaluating the success of the optimised intervention in promoting CHTC.

methodsOne hundred eighty heterosexual couples, who have been in a relationship together for at least 6 months, are being recruited and offered the optimised couples-focused intervention. In the Igugu Lethu study, we have expanded the health screening visit offered to couples to include other health conditions in addition to CHTC. Enrolled couples who choose to schedule CHTC will also have the opportunity to undertake a random blood glucose test, blood pressure and BMI measurements, and self-sample for STI testing as part of their health screening. Individual surveys are administered at baseline, 4 weeks and 4 months follow-up. The proportion of couples who decide to test together for HIV will be compared to the results of the intervention arm in the UL study (historical controls). To facilitate this comparison, we will use the same recruitment and follow-up strategies in the same community as the previous UL study. DISCUSSION: By strengthening communication and functioning within the relationship, the Igugu Lethu study, like the previous UL study, aims to transform the motivation of individual partners from a focus on their own health to shared health as a couple. The Igugu Lethu study findings will answer whether the optimised couples-focused behavioural intervention and offering CHTC as part of a broader health screening for couples can increase uptake of CHTC by 40%, an outcome that would be highly desirable in populations with high HIV prevalence.

trial registrationRetrospectively registered. ISRCTN Registry ISRCTN 46162564 Registered on 26th May 2022.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsSexual PartnersCohort StudiesCounselingHumansMass ScreeningSouth AfricaBehavioural interventionCouples-focused interventionCouples healthCouples HIV testing and counsellingSouth Africa

Identifiers

PMID35986344
PMCPMC9389496
OpenAlexW4292299629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.