Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35986279›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2022

Assessing how routes to diagnosis vary by the age of patients with cancer: a nationwide register-based cohort study in Denmark.

B Danckert, N L Christensen, A Z Falborg, H Frederiksen, G Lyratzopoulos, S McPhail, A F Pedersen, J Ryg, L A Thomsen, P Vedsted and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

B Danckert *The Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark.
N L ChristensenDepartment of Respiratory Diseases and Allergy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
A Z FalborgResearch Unit for General Practice, Aarhus, Denmark.
H FrederiksenHaematological Research Unit, Department of Haematology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
G LyratzopoulosEpidemiology of Cancer Healthcare and Outcomes (ECHO) Research Group, Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK.
S McPhailNational Disease Registration Service, NHS Digital, Leeds, UK.
A F PedersenResearch Unit for General Practice, Aarhus, Denmark.
J RygDepartment of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
L A ThomsenThe Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark.
P VedstedResearch Unit for General Practice, Aarhus, Denmark.
H Jensen *Research Unit for General Practice, Aarhus, Denmark. henry.jensen@ph.au.dk.
Danish Cancer Society · DKUniversity of Southern Denmark · DKAarhus University Hospital · DKNHS Digital · GBOdense University Hospital · DKUniversity College London · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 18180
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOlder patients with cancer have poorer prognosis compared to younger patients. Moreover, prognosis is related to how cancer is identified, and where in the healthcare system patients present, i.e. routes to diagnosis (RtD). We investigated whether RtD varied by patients' age.

methodsThis population-based national cohort study used Danish registry data. Patients were categorized into age groups and eight mutually exclusive RtD. We employed multinomial logistic regressions adjusted for sex, region, diagnosis year, cohabitation, education, income, immigration status and comorbidities. Screened and non-screened patients were analysed separately.

resultsThe study included 137,876 patients. Both younger and older patients with cancer were less likely to get diagnosed after a cancer patient pathways referral from primary care physician compared to middle-aged patients. Older patients were more likely to get diagnosed via unplanned admission, death certificate only, and outpatient admission compared to younger patients. The patterns were similar across comorbidity levels.

conclusionsRtD varied by age groups, and middle-aged patients were the most likely to get diagnosed after cancer patient pathways with referral from primary care. Emphasis should be put on raising clinicians' awareness of cancer being the underlying cause of symptoms in both younger patients and in older patients.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsAgedCohort StudiesComorbidityDenmarkHumansMiddle AgedPrognosisRegistriesCancerDenmark“Early Detection of Cancer” (MeSH)Neoplasm (MeSH)

Identifiers

PMID35986279
PMCPMC9392355
OpenAlexW4292367501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.