ReviewNature protocols2022
Small-animal blood exchange is an emerging approach for systemic aging research.
Review in Nature protocols, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Brain senescence drives sarcopenia-like transcriptomic remodeling in skeletal muscle.GeroScience · 2026Article
- Article
- Parabiosis, Assembloids, Organoids (PAO).Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Impacts of systemic milieu on cerebrovascular and brain aging: insights from heterochronic parabiosis, blood exchange, and plasma transfer experiments.GeroScience · 2025Review
- The Quest for Eternal Youth: Hallmarks of Aging and Rejuvenating Therapeutic Strategies.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- Continuous blood exchange in rats as a novel approach for experimental investigation.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Age-associated changes in innate and adaptive immunity: role of the gut microbiota.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Review
- Heterochronic Plasma Transfer: Experimental Design, Considerations, and Technical Challenges.Rejuvenation research · 2023Review
- Extracellular Vesicles in Young Serum Contribute to the Restoration of Age-Related Brain Transcriptomes and Cognition in Old Mice.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We describe a small-animal blood exchange approach developed for aging research as an alternative to heterochronic parabiosis or plasma injections. In parabiosis, animals are surgically coupled, which has several disadvantages, including difficulty controlling experimental procedure, the effects of shared organs, environmental enrichment from jointly exploring the housing enclosure, involuntary exercise and an imprecise onset of blood sharing. Likewise, in plasma injections, the added volumes need to be small, and there is little flexibility in changing the relative contributions of ectopic to endogenous blood components. These factors complicate the conclusions and interpretations, including the identification of key mechanisms and molecular or cellular determinants. Our approach, where blood is exchanged between animals without them being surgically coupled, is less invasive than parabiosis. The percentage of exchanged blood or other exchanged fluids is known and precise. The age of plasma and cells can be mixed and matched at all desired relative contributions to the endogenous systemic milieu, and the onset of the effects can be accurately delineated. In this protocol, we describe the preparatory and animal surgery steps required for small-animal blood exchange in mice and compare this process with parabiosis and plasma injections. We also provide the design, hardware and software for the blood exchange device and compare automated and manual exchange methods. Lastly, we report mathematical modeling of the dilution of blood factors. The fluid exchange takes ~30 min when performed by a well-trained biomedical scientist; the entire process takes ~2 h.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.