Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35986174›Full record

ArticleMolecular psychiatry2022

Cerebrospinal fluid proteomic study of two bipolar disorder cohorts.

Anniella Isgren, Andreas Göteson, Jessica Holmén-Larsson, Aurimantas Pelanis, Carl Sellgren, Erik Joas, Timea Sparding, Henrik Zetterberg, Erik Smedler, Joel Jakobsson and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Anniella IsgrenInstitute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg and Mölndal, Gothenburg, Sweden. anniella.isgren@gu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1901-6988
Andreas GötesonInstitute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg and Mölndal, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6118-6054
Jessica Holmén-LarssonInstitute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg and Mölndal, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Aurimantas PelanisInstitute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg and Mölndal, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Carl SellgrenDepartment of Physiology & Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Erik JoasInstitute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg and Mölndal, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Timea SpardingInstitute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg and Mölndal, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Henrik ZetterbergInstitute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg and Mölndal, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3930-4354
Erik SmedlerInstitute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg and Mölndal, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Joel JakobssonInstitute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg and Mölndal, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Mikael LandénInstitute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg and Mölndal, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4496-6451
University of Gothenburg · SEKarolinska Institutet · SESahlgrenska University Hospital · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pathophysiology of bipolar disorder remains to be elucidated and there are no diagnostic or prognostic biomarkers for the condition. In this explorative proteomic study, we analyzed 201 proteins in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) from mood stable bipolar disorder patients and control subjects sampled from two independent cohorts, amounting to a total of 204 patients and 144 controls. We used three Olink Multiplex panels, whereof one specifically targets immune biomarkers, to assess a broad set of CSF protein concentrations. After quality control and removal of proteins with a low detection rate, 105 proteins remained for analyses in relation to case-control status and clinical variables. Only case-control differences that replicated across cohorts were considered. Results adjusted for potential confounders showed that CSF concentrations of growth hormone were lower in bipolar disorder compared with controls in both cohorts. The effect size was larger when the analysis was restricted to bipolar disorder type 1 and controls. We found no indications of immune activation or other aberrations. Growth hormone exerts many effects in the central nervous system and our findings suggest that growth hormone might be implicated in the pathophysiology of bipolar disorder.

Indexed as

Bipolar DisorderBiomarkersGrowth HormoneHumansProteomicsBiomarkersGrowth Hormone

Identifiers

PMID35986174
PMCPMC9734044
OpenAlexW4292375783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.