ArticleExperimental brain research2022
Force acquisition frequency is less impaired compared to grip strength or hand dexterity in individuals with chronic stroke.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Despite numerous studies that show force regulation is impaired after stroke, two recent studies suggest that the ability to regulate submaximal, isometric grip forces may remain substantially intact. Here we asked how this aspect of hand motor control, measured for both a power grip and pinch grip, compares to two other key aspects of hand function-grip strength and dexterity. For 20 individuals with a range of hand impairment levels in the chronic phase of stroke (Age: 62 ± 16.0 years, Time post stroke: 958.3 ± 966.5 days, Sex: 19 M 1F) we quantified the average rate of target acquisition for force targets in the range of 3 to 30% maximum voluntary contraction as participants used the two different grips to squeeze a force sensor to control a cursor on a screen. The same force sensor was used to assess subject grip strength for the two grips, while dexterity was assessed using the Box and Blocks Test (BBT), and the Nine Hole Peg Test (NHPT) for both the paretic and non-paretic hand. On average, the relative rate of force acquisition of the paretic hand using a power grip was 74.0 ± 18.6 SD % of the non-paretic hand, a value significantly higher than the 48.6 ± 25.6 SD% for grip strength (paired t test, p < .005) or the 41.4 ± 29.1 SD % (p < .005) and 23.3 ± 30.1 SD % (p < .005) for the BBT and NHPT, respectively. Results were similar for the lateral pinch grip, suggesting similar thumb force tracking performance. Grip force tracking, measured as rate of force acquisition, is less impaired after stroke than hand strength or dexterity, a finding with implications for the neural mechanisms of stroke and the design of assistive technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.