ArticleHearing research2022
Cochlear implant spectral bandwidth for optimizing electric and acoustic stimulation (EAS).
Article in Hearing research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Binaural Cue Sensitivity in Children and Adults With Combined Electric and Acoustic Stimulation
Optimization and Validation of Electric Acoustic Stimulation (EAS) Mapping as a Function of Residual Hearing After CI-Implantation
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Factors Affecting Audiometric and Speech Perception Outcomes in Hybrid Cochlear Implant Recipients.The Laryngoscope · 2026Article
- State-of-the-Art on the Impact of Bimodal Acoustic Stimulation on Speech Perception in Noise in Adults: A Systematic Review.Audiology research · 2024Review
- Employing deep learning model to evaluate speech information in acoustic simulations of Cochlear implants.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Objective measure of binaural processing: Acoustic change complex in response to interaural phase differences.Hearing research · 2024Article
- Frequency importance functions in simulated bimodal cochlear-implant users with spectral holes.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2024Article
- Importance of ipsilateral residual hearing for spatial hearing by bimodal cochlear implant users.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Challenges of Cochlear Implant Use for Spatial Hearing in Children and Adolescents With Asymmetric Hearing Including Single Sided Deafness.Trends in hearingArticle
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Cochlear implantation with acoustic hearing preservation is becoming increasingly prevalent allowing cochlear implant (CI) users to combine electric and acoustic stimulation (EAS) in the implanted ears. Despite a growing EAS population, our field does not have definitive guidance regarding EAS technology optimization and the majority of previous studies investigating hearing aid (HA) and cochlear implant (CI) programming for EAS listeners have been mixed. Thus, the purpose of this exploratory study was to explore the effects of various EAS crossover frequencies-defined as the low-frequency (LF) CI cutoff-relative to the underlying spiral ganglion (SG) characteristic frequency associated with the most distal or apical electrode in the array. Speech recognition in semi-diffuse noise and subjective estimates of listening difficulty were measured for 15 adult CI recipients with acoustic hearing preservation in three listening conditions: 1) CI-alone, 2) bimodal (CI+HA), and best-aided EAS (CIHA+HA). The results showed no effect of LF CI cutoff for any of the three listening conditions such that there was no trend for increased performance or less subjective listening difficulty across LF CI cutoffs, referenced to underlying SG-place frequency. Consistent with past studies, the current results were also consistent with significant speech recognition and subject listening difficulty benefits for both bimodal (CI+HA) and best-aided EAS (CIHA+HA) as compared to CI-alone listening as well as significant additional benefits for best-aided EAS (CIHA+HA) compared to bimodal hearing (CI+HA). Future studies are necessary to investigate the efficacy of SG-place-based fittings for i) large samples of experienced EAS listeners for whom perceptual adaptation has occurred to the frequency mismatch provided by standard CI frequency allocations, and ii) EAS users at or close to CI activation as place-based approaches may ultimately yield greater outcomes, particularly for newly activated CI users for whom SG-place-based approaches may afford a steeper trajectory to performance asymptote.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.