Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35985909›Full record

ArticleIntensive & critical care nursing2023

Family support in intensive care units during COVID-19 visit ban: A multinational Delphi Study during first COVID-19 wave.

Marie-Madlen Jeitziner, Béatrice Jenni-Moser, Bjoern Zante, Katja Erne, Maria Brauchle, Sarah A Moser, Joerg C Schefold, Karin Amrein, Magdalena Hoffmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Intensive & critical care nursing, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Marie-Madlen JeitzinerDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Bern, Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; Institute of Nursing Science (INS), Department of Public Health (DPH), Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland. Electronic address: marie-madlen.jeitziner@insel.ch.
Béatrice Jenni-MoserDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Bern, Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland. Electronic address: beatrice.Jenni@insel.ch.
Bjoern ZanteDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Bern, Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland. Electronic address: bjoern.zante@insel.ch.
Katja ErneDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Bern, Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland. Electronic address: erne.katja@bluewin.ch.
Maria BrauchleDepartment for Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Landeskrankenhaus Feldkirch, Feldkirch, Austria. Electronic address: maria.brauchle@lkhf.at.
Sarah A MoserDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland. Electronic address: sarahanna.moser@insel.ch.
Joerg C SchefoldDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Bern, Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland. Electronic address: joerg.schefold@insel.ch.
Karin AmreinDivision of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria. Electronic address: karin.amrein@medunigraz.at.
Magdalena HoffmannDivision of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria; Research Unit for Safety in Health, c/o Division of Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria; Executive Department for Quality and Risk Management, University Hospital Graz, Graz, Austria. Electronic address: magdalena.hoffmann@medunigraz.at.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study assessed opinions and experiences of healthcare professionals, former patients and family members during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic and focuses on challenges in family-centred care for intensive care unit patients and affected families. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY/

designA two-round modified Delphi process assessed the opinions and experiences of experts such as healthcare professionals, former patients and their families (n = 151).

settingThis study was conducted across four countries in Europe.

resultsIn total, 121 participants (response rate 80.13%) answered the first Delphi round; the second was answered by 131 participants (response rate 86.75%). Participants perceived family support in the intensive care unit as highly important during the COVID-19 pandemic. Enabling contact amongst patients, families and clinicians is regarded as essential to build hope and confidence in the treatment and the recovery process. The extraordinary situation led to the implementation of new communication structures such as video calls and websites.

conclusionA consensus was reached between healthcare professionals that virtual contact is essential for patients with COVID-19 and their families during visit restrictions. This should be done to establish confidence in the treatment.

Indexed as

COVID-19Delphi TechniqueFamilyFamily SupportHumansIntensive Care UnitsPandemicsCommunicationCOVID-19Critical careFamilyIsolationVisiting ban

Identifiers

PMID35985909
PMCPMC9343738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.