ArticleJournal of immunological methods2022
Digital RT-PCR Chip method for detection of SARS-CoV-2 virus.
Article in Journal of immunological methods, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Digital PCR in Virology: Current Applications and Future Perspectives.Molecular diagnosis & therapy · 2025Review
- Establishment and application of a dual chip digital PCR assay for detection of PDCoV and PEDV.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
- Advancing Pathogen Identification: The Role of Digital PCR in Enhancing Diagnostic Power in Different Settings.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The "gold standard" method for detection of SARS-CoV-2 is the real time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, but due to pre-analytical and technical limitations, biological samples with low viral load are not sometimes detected. For this purpose a digital RT-PCR method on-chip was developed for detection of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, using two TaqMan™ Assays for quantification of the N Protein (Nucleocapsid) and the S Protein (Spike), and the QuantStudio™ 3D Digital PCR instrument. The method was applied to assess the nasopharyngeal swabs of asymptomatic subjects recruited in the UNICORN Study. The digital RT-PCR method is characterized by a higher sensitivity than the RT-qPCR method, even if performed with the same TaqMan™, and could be a promising tool for SARS-CoV-2 viral load quantification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.