Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35985344›Full record

ReviewThe European journal of neuroscience2022

Brain entropy, fractal dimensions and predictability: A review of complexity measures for EEG in healthy and neuropsychiatric populations.

Zen J Lau, Tam Pham, S H Annabel Chen, Dominique Makowski

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The European journal of neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 101 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
101citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

101 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Neural complexity EEG biomarkers of rapid and post-rapid ketamine effects in late-life treatment-resistant depression: a randomized control trial.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2023
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Electrophysiological features of signals recorded from white matter.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  6. Cognitive Processing and EEG Complexity.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

41 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zen J LauSchool of Social Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0003-4429-4082
Tam PhamSchool of Social Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-6392-6703
S H Annabel ChenSchool of Social Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-1540-5516
Dominique MakowskiSchool of Social Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0001-5375-9967

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There has been an increasing trend towards the use of complexity analysis in quantifying neural activity measured by electroencephalography (EEG) signals. On top of revealing complex neuronal processes of the brain that may not be possible with linear approaches, EEG complexity measures have also demonstrated their potential as biomarkers of psychopathology such as depression and schizophrenia. Unfortunately, the opacity of algorithms and descriptions originating from mathematical concepts have made it difficult to understand what complexity is and how to draw consistent conclusions when applied within psychology and neuropsychiatry research. In this review, we provide an overview and entry-level explanation of existing EEG complexity measures, which can be broadly categorized as measures of predictability and regularity. We then synthesize complexity findings across different areas of psychological science, namely, in consciousness research, mood and anxiety disorders, schizophrenia, neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative disorders, as well as changes across the lifespan, while addressing some theoretical and methodological issues underlying the discrepancies in the data. Finally, we present important considerations when choosing and interpreting these metrics.

Indexed as

FractalsSchizophreniaBrainElectroencephalographyEntropyHumanscomplexityEEGentropyfractal dimensionpsychopathology

Identifiers

PMID35985344
PMCPMC9826422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.