Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35985082›Full record

ReviewPublic health2022

Behavioural determinants of COVID-19 vaccination acceptance among healthcare workers: a rapid review.

J Crawshaw, K Konnyu, G Castillo, Z van Allen, J M Grimshaw, J Presseau

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The impact of COVID-19 on the mental health workforce: A rapid review.International journal of mental health nursing · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

J CrawshawCentre for Evidence-Based Implementation, Hamilton Health Sciences, ON, Canada; Department of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, ON, Canada.
K KonnyuCenter for Evidence Synthesis in Health, Department of Health Services, Policy and Practice, School of Public Health, Brown University, RI, USA.
G CastilloCentre for Implementation Research, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, ON, Canada.
Z van AllenCentre for Implementation Research, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, ON, Canada.
J M GrimshawCentre for Implementation Research, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, ON, Canada; Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, ON, Canada.
J PresseauCentre for Implementation Research, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, ON, Canada; School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, ON, Canada. Electronic address: jpresseau@ohri.ca.
Ottawa Hospital · CAUniversity of Ottawa · CAHamilton Health Sciences · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesVaccinating healthcare workers (HCWs) against COVID-19 has been a public health priority since rollout began in late 2020. Promoting COVID-19 vaccination among HCWs would benefit from identifying modifiable behavioural determinants. We sought to identify and categorize studies looking at COVID-19 vaccination acceptance to identify modifiable factors to increase uptake in HCWs. STUDY

designRapid evidence review.

methodsWe searched MEDLINE and Cochrane databases until May 2021 and conducted a grey literature search to identify cross-sectional, cohort, and qualitative studies. Key barriers to, and enablers of, vaccine acceptance were categorized using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), a comprehensive theoretical framework comprising 14 behavioural domains.

resultsFrom 19,591 records, 74 studies were included. Almost two-thirds of responding HCWs were willing to accept a COVID-19 vaccine (median = 64%, interquartile range = 50-78%). Twenty key barriers and enablers were identified and categorized into eight TDF domains. The most frequently identified barriers to COVID-19 vaccination were as follows: concerns about vaccine safety, efficacy, and speed of development (TDF domain: Beliefs about consequences); individuals in certain HCW roles (Social/professional role and identity); and mistrust in state/public health response to COVID-19 (Social influences). Routinely being vaccinated for seasonal influenza (Reinforcement), concerns about contracting COVID-19 (Beliefs about consequences) and working directly with COVID-19 patients (Social/professional role and identity) were key enablers of COVID-19 vaccination among HCWs. DISCUSSION: Our review identified eight (of a possible 14) behavioural determinants of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance among HCWs that, if targeted, could help design tailored vaccination messaging, policy, campaigns, and programs to support HCWs vaccination uptake.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesCross-Sectional StudiesHealth PersonnelHumansPatient Acceptance of Health CareVaccinationCOVID-19 VaccinesBarriers and enablersCOVID-19Healthcare professionalsHealthcare workersRapid reviewTheoretical Domains FrameworkVaccination

Identifiers

PMID35985082
PMCPMC9192793
OpenAlexW4282822077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.