Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35984902›Full record

ArticleBlood2023

The location of the t(4;14) translocation breakpoint within the NSD2 gene identifies a subset of patients with high-risk NDMM.

Nicholas Stong, María Ortiz-Estévez, Fadi Towfic, Mehmet Samur, Amit Agarwal, Jill Corre, Erin Flynt, Nikhil Munshi, Hervé Avet-Loiseau, Anjan Thakurta

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Blood, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. International Myeloma Society/International Myeloma Working Group Consensus Recommendations on the Definition of High-Risk Multiple Myeloma.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2025
    Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Defining High-Risk Disease Biology in Multiple Myeloma: A Narrative Review.Blood and lymphatic cancer : targets and therapy · 2026
    Review
  17. Saga of MCL1 inhibitors in multiple myeloma.Biochemical pharmacology · 2026
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. [Prognostic value of high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities inmultiple myeloma].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Nicholas StongPredictive Sciences, Bristol Myers Squibb, Summit, NJ.ORCID 0000-0002-0678-637X
María Ortiz-EstévezPredictive Sciences, BMS Center for Innovation and Translational Research Europe (CITRE), A Bristol Myers Squibb Company, Seville, Spain.
Fadi TowficPredictive Sciences, Bristol Myers Squibb, San Diego, CA.ORCID 0000-0001-6756-647X
Mehmet SamurDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
Amit AgarwalMedical Affairs, Bristol Myers Squibb, Summit, NJ.
Jill CorreUnit of Genomics in Myeloma, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse-Oncopole, Toulouse, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1580-6106
Erin FlyntTranslational Medicine, Bristol Myers Squibb, Summit, NJ.
Nikhil MunshiDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
Hervé Avet-LoiseauUnit of Genomics in Myeloma, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse-Oncopole, Toulouse, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3050-0140
Anjan ThakurtaTranslational Medicine, Bristol Myers Squibb, Summit, NJ.ORCID 0000-0003-0415-1706
Bristol-Myers Squibb (United States) · USHarvard University · USInstitut universitaire du cancer de Toulouse Oncopole · FR

Funding

Trageting the Multiple Myeloma EpigenomeP50CA100707 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE · PI ANDERSON, KENNETH C., MUNSHI, NIKHIL C. · 2003 to 2023
$45.0M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA100707
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although translocation events between chromosome 4 (NSD2 gene) and chromosome 14 (immunoglobulin heavy chain [IgH] locus) (t(4;14)) is considered high risk in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM), only ∼30% to 40% of t(4;14) patients are clinically high risk. We generated and compared a large whole genome sequencing (WGS) and transcriptome (RNA sequencing) from 258 t(4;14) (n = 153 discovery, n = 105 replication) and 183 non-t(4;14) NDMM patients with associated clinical data. A landmark survival analysis indicated only ∼25% of t(4;14) patients had an overall survival (OS) <24 months, and a comparative analysis of the patient subgroups identified biomarkers associated with this poor outcome, including translocation breakpoints located in the NSD2 gene and expression of IgH-NSD2 fusion transcripts. Three breakpoints were identified and are designated as: "no-disruption" (upstream of NSD2), "early-disruption" (in the 5' UTR), and "late-disruption" (within the NSD2 gene). Our results show a significant difference in OS based on the location of DNA breakpoints (median OS 28.6 "late-disruption" vs 59.2 "early disruption" vs 75.1 months "no disruption"). These findings have been replicated in an independent replication dataset. Also, univariate and multivariate analysis suggest high-risk markers such as del17p, 1p independently contribute to poor outcome in t(4;14) MM patients.

Indexed as

Multiple MyelomaBase SequenceHumansTranscriptomeTranslocation, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID35984902
PMCPMC10163314
OpenAlexW4294250143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.