Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35984844›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Students and examiners perception on virtual medical graduation exam during the COVID-19 quarantine period: A cross-sectional study.

Nazdar Ezzaddin Alkhateeb, Baderkhan Saeed Ahmed, Namir Ghanim Al-Tawil, Ali A Al-Dabbagh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nazdar Ezzaddin AlkhateebDepartment of Medical Education, College of Medicine, Hawler Medical University, Erbil, Kurdistan Region, Iraq.ORCID 0000-0001-9954-1162
Baderkhan Saeed AhmedDepartment of Surgery, College of Medicine, Hawler Medical University, Erbil, Kurdistan Region, Iraq.
Namir Ghanim Al-TawilDepartment of Community Medicine, College of Medicine, Hawler Medical University, Erbil, Kurdistan Region, Iraq.
Ali A Al-DabbaghDepartment of Medical Education, College of Medicine, Hawler Medical University, Erbil, Kurdistan Region, Iraq.
Hawler Medical University · IQ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith the emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown approach that was adopted all over the world, conducting assessments while maintaining integrity became a big challenge. This article aims at sharing the experience of conducting an online assessment with the academic community and to assess its effectiveness from both examiners' and students' perspectives.

methodsAn online assessment was carried out for the final year medical students of Hawler Medical University/Iraq during the lockdown period of the COVID-19 pandemic, June 2020. Then, an online questionnaire was sent to a sample of 61 examiners and 108 students who have been involved in evaluating the mentioned assessment process. Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to compare the mean ranks of the overall satisfaction scores between categories of the students and examiners. Categorical data were summarized and presented as frequencies and percentages.

resultsThe response rates among examiners and students were 69.4% and 88.5% respectively. The majority of the examiners were generally satisfied with the online examination process compared to only around a third of the students. However, both examiners and students agreed that online examination was not suitable for assessing the physical examination skills.

conclusionThe online assessment can be considered a good alternative and acceptable method for medical students' assessment in unpredicted emergencies, yet it was not applicable in testing physical examination skills.

Indexed as

COVID-19Students, MedicalCommunicable Disease ControlCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPandemicsPerceptionQuarantine

Identifiers

PMID35984844
PMCPMC9390930
OpenAlexW4292385796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.