Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35984840›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2022

DSCN: Double-target selection guided by CRISPR screening and network.

Enze Liu, Xue Wu, Lei Wang, Yang Huo, Huanmei Wu, Lang Li, Lijun Cheng

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 57% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Enze LiuDivision of Hematology and Oncology, School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3162-461X
Xue WuDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0511-9436
Lei WangDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1904-1737
Yang HuoDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America.
Huanmei WuCollege of Public Health, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-0346-6044
Lang LiDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0746-1809
Lijun ChengDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-6336-5416
The Ohio State University · USTemple University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer is a complex disease with usually multiple disease mechanisms. Target combination is a better strategy than a single target in developing cancer therapies. However, target combinations are generally more difficult to be predicted. Current CRISPR-cas9 technology enables genome-wide screening for potential targets, but only a handful of genes have been screend as target combinations. Thus, an effective computational approach for selecting candidate target combinations is highly desirable. Selected target combinations also need to be translational between cell lines and cancer patients. We have therefore developed DSCN (double-target selection guided by CRISPR screening and network), a method that matches expression levels in patients and gene essentialities in cell lines through spectral-clustered protein-protein interaction (PPI) network. In DSCN, a sub-sampling approach is developed to model first-target knockdown and its impact on the PPI network, and it also facilitates the selection of a second target. Our analysis first demonstrated a high correlation of the DSCN sub-sampling-based gene knockdown model and its predicted differential gene expressions using observed gene expression in 22 pancreatic cell lines before and after MAP2K1 and MAP2K2 inhibition (R2 = 0.75). In DSCN algorithm, various scoring schemes were evaluated. The 'diffusion-path' method showed the most significant statistical power of differentialting known synthetic lethal (SL) versus non-SL gene pairs (P = 0.001) in pancreatic cancer. The superior performance of DSCN over existing network-based algorithms, such as OptiCon and VIPER, in the selection of target combinations is attributable to its ability to calculate combinations for any gene pairs, whereas other approaches focus on the combinations among optimized regulators in the network. DSCN's computational speed is also at least ten times fast than that of other methods. Finally, in applying DSCN to predict target combinations and drug combinations for individual samples (DSCNi), DSCNi showed high correlation between target combinations predicted and real synergistic combinations (P = 1e-5) in pancreatic cell lines. In summary, DSCN is a highly effective computational method for the selection of target combinations.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsAlgorithmsDrug CombinationsGene Knockdown TechniquesHumansProtein Interaction MapsDrug Combinations

Identifiers

PMID35984840
PMCPMC9578612
OpenAlexW4292386143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.