Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35984734›Full record

SynthesisJournal of behavioral addictions2022

Prevalence of internet addiction in Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Francky Teddy Endomba, Anastasia Demina, Vincent Meille, Aude Laetitia Ndoadoumgue, Celestin Danwang, Benjamin Petit, Benoit Trojak

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of behavioral addictions, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. The Worldwide Prevalence of Internet Addiction among Medical Students: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Francky Teddy Endomba1Research Department, Medical Mind Association, Yaoundé, Cameroon.ORCID 0000-0001-7023-1953
Anastasia Demina3General Medicine Internship, University of Burgundy, 21000, Dijon, France.ORCID 0000-0001-7694-6618
Vincent Meille4Department of Addictology, CHU Dijon Bourgogne, Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté, France.
Aude Laetitia Ndoadoumgue5School of Health and Related Research, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7456-2036
Celestin Danwang6Epidemiology and Biostatistics Unit, Institute of Experimental and Clinical Research, Catholic University of Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-7976-4331
Benjamin Petit4Department of Addictology, CHU Dijon Bourgogne, Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6670-7920
Benoit Trojak4Department of Addictology, CHU Dijon Bourgogne, Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3315-882X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and aim: In the last two decades, the proportion of internet users has greatly increased worldwide. Data regarding internet addiction (IA) are lacking in Africa compared to other continents. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to estimate the pooled prevalence of IA in African countries. Methods: We systematically sought relevant articles in PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and Cochrane database published before September 25, 2021. The risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute tool, and we estimated the pooled prevalence of IA using a random-effects meta-analytic model. We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. Results: We included 22 studies (13,365 participants), and collected data from Egypt, Ethiopia, Morocco, Nigeria, South Africa, Tanzania and Tunisia between 2013 and 2021. The mean age of participants ranged from 14.8 to 26.1 years, and the most used tool for IA screening was the Young's 20-item Internet Addiction Test. The pooled prevalence rate of IA was 40.3% (95% CI: 32.2%-48.7%), with substantial heterogeneity. The pooled prevalence for Northern Africa was 44.6% (95% CI: 32.9%-56.7%), significantly higher than the prevalence in sub-Saharan Africa, which was 31.0% (95% CI: 25.2%-37.1%). The risk of bias was moderate for most studies, the certainty was very low, and we found no publication bias. Discussion and conclusions: Four in every ten individuals was considered to have IA in Africa. Further research with methodological optimization seems needed, especially for IA screening tools and the representativity of some subregions.

Indexed as

PrevalenceAdolescentAdultHumansSouth AfricaYoung Adultafricainternet addictionmeta-analysisprevalencesystematic review

Identifiers

PMID35984734
PMCPMC9872524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.