Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35984695›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2022

mHealth Physical Activity Intervention for Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury: Planning and Development Processes.

Sarah Victoria Clewes Lawrason, Lynda Brown-Ganzert, Lysa Campeau, Megan MacInnes, C J Wilkins, Kathleen Anne Martin Ginis

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05063617 (Assessing the Acceptability and Feasibility of an mHealth App to Increase the Quantity and Quality of Physical Activity Experiences Among Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury Who Ambulate), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05063617 nacompletednot on this map

Assessing the Acceptability and Feasibility of an mHealth App to Increase the Quantity and Quality of Physical Activity Experiences Among Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury Who Ambulate

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of British ColumbiaRan2021 to 2021Enrolled21ConditionsSpinal Cord InjuriesArmsSCI Step Together
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sarah Victoria Clewes LawrasonSchool of Health and Exercise Sciences, Faculty of Health and Social Development, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1830-8655
Lynda Brown-GanzertCuratio Networks Inc., Kelowna, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5672-2614
Lysa CampeauCuratio Networks Inc., Kelowna, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8360-8817
Megan MacInnesCommunity Research Partner, Kelowna, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0709-3740
C J WilkinsCommunity Research Partner, Kelowna, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3905-3164
Kathleen Anne Martin GinisSchool of Health and Exercise Sciences, Faculty of Health and Social Development, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7076-3594
University of British Columbia · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInterventions to support physical activity participation among individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) are required given this population's low levels of physical activity and extensive barriers to quality physical activity experiences.

objectiveThis study aimed to develop a mobile health intervention, called SCI Step Together, to improve the quantity and quality of physical activity among individuals with SCI who walk.

methodsOur overarching methodological framework was the Person-Based approach. This included the following 4 steps: conduct primary and secondary research (step 1); design intervention objectives and features (step 2a); conduct behavioral analysis and theory (step 2b); create a logic model (step 3); and complete the SCI Step Together program content and integrated knowledge translation (IKT; step 4), which occurred throughout development. The partnership approach was informed by the SCI IKT Guiding Principles. Three end users pilot-tested the app and participated in the interviews.

resultsStep 1 identified issues to be addressed when designing intervention objectives and features (step 2a) and features were mapped onto the Behavior Change Wheel (step 2b) to determine the behavior change techniques (eg, action planning) to be included in the app. The logic model linked the mechanisms of action to self-determination theory (steps 2/3). Interviews with end users generated recommendations for the technology (eg, comparing physical activity levels with guidelines), trial (eg, emailing participants' worksheets), and intervention content (eg, removing graded tasks; step 4).

conclusionsUsing the SCI IKT Guiding Principles to guide partner engagement and involvement ensured that design partners had shared decision-making power in intervention development. Equal decision-making power maximizes the meaningfulness of the app for end users. Future research will include testing the acceptability, feasibility, and engagement of the program. Partners will be involved throughout the research process.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05063617; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05063617.

Indexed as

exercisemobile appsmobile phonespinal cord injuriesstakeholder participationtelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID35984695
PMCPMC9440410
OpenAlexW4292362327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.