Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35984689›Full record

ArticleJMIR aging2022

Implementing Technology Literacy Programs in Retirement Homes and Residential Care Facilities: Conceptual Framework.

Karen S Li, Nathan Nagallo, Erica McDonald, Colin Whaley, Kelly Grindrod, Karla Boluk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR aging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Karen S LiDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6815-9152
Nathan NagalloenTECH Computer Club, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3097-3861
Erica McDonaldenTECH Computer Club, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3035-2886
Colin WhaleyenTECH Computer Club, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9651-1312
Kelly GrindrodSchool of Pharmacy, Faculty of Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1135-0391
Karla BolukDepartment of Recreation and Leisure Studies, Faculty of Health, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3096-0710

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic caused widespread societal disruption, with governmental stay-at-home orders resulting in people connecting more via technology rather than in person. This shift had major impacts on older adult residents staying in retirement homes and residential care facilities, where they may lack the technology literacy needed to stay connected. The enTECH Computer Club from the University of Waterloo in Ontario, Canada created a knowledge translation toolkit to support organizations interested in starting technology literacy programs (TLPs) by providing guidance and practical tips.

objectiveThis paper aimed to present a framework for implementing TLPs in retirement homes and residential care facilities through expanding on the knowledge translation toolkit and the framework for person-centered care.

methodsMajor concepts relating to the creation of a TLP in retirement homes and residential care facilities were extracted from the enTECH knowledge translation toolkit. The domains from the framework for person-centered care were modified to fit a TLP context. The concepts identified from the toolkit were sorted into the three framework categories: "structure," "process," and "outcome." Information from the knowledge translation toolkit were extracted into the three categories and synthesized to form foundational principles and potential actions.

resultsAll 13 domains from the framework for person-centered care were redefined to shift the focus on TLP implementation, with 7 domains under "structure," 4 domains under "process," and 2 domains under "outcome." Domains in the "structure" category focus on developing an organizational infrastructure to deliver a successful TLP; 10 foundational principles and 25 potential actions were identified for this category. Domains in the "process" category focus on outlining procedures taken by stakeholders involved to ensure a smooth transition from conceptualization into action; 12 foundational principles and 9 potential actions were identified for this category. Domains in the "outcome" category focus on evaluating the TLP to consider making any improvements to better serve the needs of older adults and staff; 6 foundational principles and 6 potential actions were identified for this category.

conclusionsSeveral domains and their foundational principles and potential actions from the TLP framework were found to be consistent with existing literatures that encourage taking active steps to increase technology literacy in older adults. Although there may be some limitations to the components of the framework with the current state of the pandemic, starting TLPs in the community can yield positive outcomes that will be beneficial to both older adult participants and the organization in the long term.

Indexed as

conceptelderlyframeworkimplementationknowledge translationliteracylong-term careolder adultretirementretirement homesocial connectionstechnologytechnology literacy program

Identifiers

PMID35984689
PMCPMC9440411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.