Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35984630›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2023

Patient Understanding of Oncologic Radiology Reports: Is Access to Electronic Medical Records Helpful?

Jana Wieland, Kelly Quinn, Katelyn Stenger, Shirley Cheng, Jared Acoba

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Cancer Education in the Era of Immediate Results Access.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jana WielandJohn A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawai'i, 651 Ilalo St, Honolulu, HI, 96825, USA. wieland.jana@mayo.edu.
Kelly QuinnJohn A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawai'i, 651 Ilalo St, Honolulu, HI, 96825, USA.
Katelyn StengerCalifornia Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA, USA.
Shirley ChengJohn A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawai'i, 651 Ilalo St, Honolulu, HI, 96825, USA.
Jared AcobaQueen's Medical Center, Honolulu, HI, USA.
University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa · USCalifornia Polytechnic State University · USUniversity of Hawaii System · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Access to electronic medical record (EMR) patient portals made it easier for patients to quickly acquire the results of their radiology studies. However, there is little research on how well oncology patients understand the findings of radiology reports presented in the online portal without patient-physician discussion. This study assessed oncology patients' confidence and accuracy in interpreting radiology reports either with or without layman translations. A survey based on a radiology report was administered to oncology patients and caregivers. Two versions of the radiological report were randomly distributed, either a standard report or one with layman translations to evaluate participant understanding and accuracy of interpreting radiological results. Among 85 participants, a majority (67.8%) reported wanting patient portal access to radiological reports, yet less than a quarter (21.2%) felt confident in reading and interpreting radiological reports. Univariate binary logistic regression models showed that participants who read the lay report were 8 times more likely to find the radiology report easy to read. This research demonstrated that the inclusion of layman translation of standard radiology reports improves oncology patients' and caregivers' understanding of such reports with statistically significant and clinically meaningful increases in readability.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsPatient PortalsRadiologyConfidentialityElectronic Health RecordsHumansOncologyRadiological reportsRadiology

Identifiers

PMID35984630
OpenAlexW4292484632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.