Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35984614›Full record

Observational studyJournal of microbiology (Seoul, Korea)2022

Early gut microbiota in very low and extremely low birth weight preterm infants with feeding intolerance: a prospective case-control study.

Ling Liu, Dang Ao, Xiangsheng Cai, Peiyi Huang, Nali Cai, Shaozhu Lin, Benqing Wu

Open access · bronzeAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of microbiology (Seoul, Korea), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ling LiuJinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510000, China.
Dang AoDepartment of Pediatrics, Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, Guangdong, 524000, China.
Xiangsheng CaiUniversity of the Chinese Academy of Sciences - Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518000, China.
Peiyi HuangDepartment of Pediatrics, Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, Guangdong, 524000, China.
Nali CaiDepartment of Pediatrics, Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, Guangdong, 524000, China.
Shaozhu LinDepartment of Pediatrics, Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, Guangdong, 524000, China.
Benqing WuJinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510000, China. wubenqing783@126.com.
Guangdong Medical College · CNChinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen · CNJinan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The potential role of the gut microbiota in the pathogenesis of feeding intolerance (FI) remains unclear. Understanding the role of the gut microbiota could provide a new avenue for microbiota-targeted therapeutics. This study aimed to explore the associations between aberrant gut microbiota and FI in very low or extremely low birth weight (VLBW/ELBW) preterm infants. In this observational case-control study, VLBW/ELBW infants were divided into two groups: FI group and feeding tolerance (FT) group. 16S rRNA gene sequencing was performed to analyze the gut microbial diversity and composition of the infants. The differences in the gut microbiota of the two groups were compared. In total, 165 stool samples were obtained from 44 infants, among which, 31 developed FI and 13 served as controls. Alpha diversity was the highest in the meconium samples of the two groups. LEfSe analysis revealed that the abundances of Peptostreptococcaceae, Clostridiales and Clostridia in the FT group were significantly higher than in the FI group. At the phylum level, the FI group was dominated by Proteobacteria, and the FT group was dominated by Firmicutes. The meconium samples of the FI group had higher proportions of γ-proteobacteria and Escherichia-Shigella and a lower proportion of Bacteroides compared with the FT group. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analysis demonstrated that aberrant gut bacteria in the FI group were strongly associated with dysregulation of C5-Branched-dibasic-acid-metabolism, protein kinases, and sporulation. These findings reveal candidate microbial markers to prevent FI. Increased relative abundances of γ-proteobacteria and Escherichia-Shigella and decreased abundance of Bacteroides in meconium were associated with an increased risk of FI, while Peptostreptococcaceae, Clostridiales and Clostridia reduced the risk of FI in VLBW/ELBW infants.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeBacillotaCase-Control StudiesEubacterialesHumansInfantInfant, Extremely Low Birth WeightInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureProtein KinasesRNA, Ribosomal, 16SProtein KinasesRNA, Ribosomal, 16SBacteroidesClostridiaClostridialesEscherichia-Shigellaextremely low birth weightfeeding intolerancegut microbiotaPeptostreptococcaceaevery low birth weightγ-proteobacteria

Identifiers

PMID35984614
PMCPMC9390111
OpenAlexW4294308844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.