Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35984589›Full record

ArticleJournal of computer-aided molecular design2022

Covalent docking in CDOCKER.

Yujin Wu, Charles L Brooks Iii

Abstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computer-aided molecular design, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. SPIN-guided engineering of a novel (Synthetic and systems biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Discovery of Covalent Ligands with AlphaFold3.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Two-Step Covalent Docking with Attracting Cavities.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yujin WuDepartment of Chemistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 500 S State St, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109, USA.
Charles L Brooks IiiDepartment of Chemistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 500 S State St, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109, USA. brookscl@umich.edu.

Funding

Theory and Modeling of Biomolecules and their Interactions - Equipment SupplementR35GM130587 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI CHARLES L BROOKS · 2019 to 2026
$6.9M
Theoretical Studies of Receptor-Ligand InteractionsR01GM037554 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BROOKS, CHARLES L · 1987 to 2018
$3.8M
Acid-mediated processes in nucleic acids and proteinsR01GM107233 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BROOKS, CHARLES L · 2014 to 2017
$1.1M
Computational infrastructure for biomedically-driven simulation and modelingS10OD034346 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BROOKS, CHARLES L · 2023 to 2023
$593k
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM037554NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM107233NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM130587NIH HHS GM130587NIH HHS S10 OD034346
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Targeted covalent inhibitors (TCIs) are considered to be an important component in the toolbox of drug discovery and about 30% of currently marketed drugs are TCIs. Although these drugs raise concerns about toxicity, their high potencies and prolonged effects result in less-frequent drug dosing and wide therapeutic margins for patients. This leads to increased interests in developing new computational methods to identify novel covalent inhibitors. The implementation of successful in silico docking algorithms have the potential to provide significant savings of time and money in the discovery of lead compounds. In this paper, we describe the implementation and testing of a covalent docking methodology in Rigid CDOCKER and the optimization of the corresponding physics-based scoring function with an additional customizable covalent bond grid potential which represents the free energy change of bond formation between the ligand and the receptor. We optimize the covalent bond grid potential for different common covalent bond formation reaction in TCIs. The average runtime for docking one covalent compound is 15 minutes which is comparable or faster than other well-established covalent docking methods. We demonstrate comparable top rank accuracy compared with other covalent docking algorithms using the pose prediction benchmark dataset for covalent docking algorithms developed by the Keserű group. Finally, we construct a retrospective virtual screening benchmark dataset containing 8 different receptor targets with different covalent bond formation reactions. To our knowledge, this is the largest dataset for benchmarking covalent docking methods. We show that our new covalent docking algorithm has the ability to identify lead compounds among a large chemical space. The largest AUC value is 0.909 for the target receptor CATK and the warhead chemistry of the covalent inhibitors is addition to the aldehyde functionality.

Indexed as

AldehydesHumansLigandsMolecular Docking SimulationProtein BindingRetrospective StudiesAldehydesLigandsCovalent dockingRigid CDOCKERVirtual screening

Identifiers

PMID35984589
PMCPMC9700487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.