ArticleJournal of computer-aided molecular design2022
Covalent docking in CDOCKER.
Article in Journal of computer-aided molecular design, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- SPIN-guided engineering of a novel (Synthetic and systems biotechnology · 2026Article
- Benchmarking co-folding methods to predict the structures of covalent protein-ligand complexes.Acta pharmacologica Sinica · 2026Article
- Discovery of Covalent Ligands with AlphaFold3.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2026Article
- Uncovering Major Structural and Functional Features of Methyl-Coenzyme M Reductase (MCR) fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Hybrid quantum/classical docking of covalent and non-covalent ligands with Attracting Cavities.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The covalent docking software landscape: features and applications in drug design.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Review
- Structure-based rational design of covalent probes.Communications chemistry · 2025Review
- Computer-aided drug design for the double-membrane vesicle pore complex inhibitors against SARS-CoV-2.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- CHARMM at 45: Enhancements in Accessibility, Functionality, and Speed.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2024Review
- Structure-Based Identification of Kelch-like ECH-Associated Protein 1 as a Pharmacological Target of Electrophile-Containing Catechol-ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2024Article
- Rational Design of Key Enzymes to Efficiently Synthesize Phycocyanobilin inBiomolecules · 2024Article
- Lead generation of UPPS inhibitors targeting MRSA: Using 3D-QSAR pharmacophore modeling, virtual screening, molecular docking, and molecular dynamic simulations.BMC chemistry · 2024Article
- Two-Step Covalent Docking with Attracting Cavities.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Targeted covalent inhibitors (TCIs) are considered to be an important component in the toolbox of drug discovery and about 30% of currently marketed drugs are TCIs. Although these drugs raise concerns about toxicity, their high potencies and prolonged effects result in less-frequent drug dosing and wide therapeutic margins for patients. This leads to increased interests in developing new computational methods to identify novel covalent inhibitors. The implementation of successful in silico docking algorithms have the potential to provide significant savings of time and money in the discovery of lead compounds. In this paper, we describe the implementation and testing of a covalent docking methodology in Rigid CDOCKER and the optimization of the corresponding physics-based scoring function with an additional customizable covalent bond grid potential which represents the free energy change of bond formation between the ligand and the receptor. We optimize the covalent bond grid potential for different common covalent bond formation reaction in TCIs. The average runtime for docking one covalent compound is 15 minutes which is comparable or faster than other well-established covalent docking methods. We demonstrate comparable top rank accuracy compared with other covalent docking algorithms using the pose prediction benchmark dataset for covalent docking algorithms developed by the Keserű group. Finally, we construct a retrospective virtual screening benchmark dataset containing 8 different receptor targets with different covalent bond formation reactions. To our knowledge, this is the largest dataset for benchmarking covalent docking methods. We show that our new covalent docking algorithm has the ability to identify lead compounds among a large chemical space. The largest AUC value is 0.909 for the target receptor CATK and the warhead chemistry of the covalent inhibitors is addition to the aldehyde functionality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.