Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35984465›Full record

ArticleOrthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany)2022

Status and future of modern technologies in arthroplasty : Results of a survey of the German Society for Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery (DGOU).

C Schnurr, J Beckmann, C Lüring, C Tibesku, K U Schlüter-Brust, M Ettinger, J Franke

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

C SchnurrAGITEC-Arbeitsgemeinschaft für intraoperative Bildgebung und Technologie Integration der DGOU, Berlin, Germany. christoph.schnurr@gmx.de.
J BeckmannAGITEC-Arbeitsgemeinschaft für intraoperative Bildgebung und Technologie Integration der DGOU, Berlin, Germany.
C LüringAGITEC-Arbeitsgemeinschaft für intraoperative Bildgebung und Technologie Integration der DGOU, Berlin, Germany.
C TibeskuKniepraxis, Straubing, Germany.
K U Schlüter-BrustAGITEC-Arbeitsgemeinschaft für intraoperative Bildgebung und Technologie Integration der DGOU, Berlin, Germany.
M EttingerOrthopädische Klinik der MHH im DIAKOVERE Annastift, Hannover, Germany.
J FrankeAGITEC-Arbeitsgemeinschaft für intraoperative Bildgebung und Technologie Integration der DGOU, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe orthopedic community is divided on the question of whether modern technologies in arthroplasty improve outcomes. Therefore, the aim of this initiative of the working group on intraoperative imaging and technology integration (Arbeitsgemeinschaft intraoperative Bildgebung und Technologieintegration, AGiTEC) is to initiate the collection of additional data for the scientific evaluation of modern technologies. QUESTION: To what extent are modern technologies currently used and which implementations are planned? Do the members of the German Society for Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery (DGOU) consider the acquisition of additional data for scientific assessment necessary?

methodsMembers of the DGOU were asked via an e‑mail survey about the distribution and projected introduction of modern technologies in arthroplasty. They were also asked whether sufficient data were collected for scientific evaluation and whether acquisition of additional data in studies or arthroplasty registries were considered necessary.

resultsOf the 7923 probands surveyed, 428 completed the questionnaire in full (5.4%). It was found that individual implants and navigation are currently the most frequently used (31% and 29%, respectively). The largest increases in the next 2 years are projected for virtual reality and robotics (+30% and +23%, respectively), 85% of respondents indicated that insufficient data were collected for scientific evaluation, and 89% each requested initiation of multicenter studies and inclusion of technologies in the arthroplasty registry.

conclusionThe results of this study should motivate the scientific community, industry, and those responsible for the arthroplasty registries to collect and analyze data for the scientific assessment of modern technologies.

Indexed as

Orthopedic ProceduresOrthopedicsArthroplastySurveys and QuestionnairesTechnologyEvidenceNavigationRoboticsTotal hip arthroplastyTotal knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.