Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35984328›Full record

ArticleSystematic biology2023

Sexual Signals Persist over Deep Time: Ancient Co-option of Bioluminescence for Courtship Displays in Cypridinid Ostracods.

Emily A Ellis, Jessica A Goodheart, Nicholai M Hensley, Vanessa L González, Nicholas J Reda, Trevor J Rivers, James G Morin, Elizabeth Torres, Gretchen A Gerrish, Todd H Oakley

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Glow in the D-ARK: a new bioluminescent species ofRoyal Society open science · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Emily A EllisDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3343-0923
Jessica A GoodheartDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0754-5751
Nicholai M HensleyDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0681-0808
Vanessa L GonzálezDepartment of Invertebrate Zoology, Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History, 10th and Constitution NW, Washington, DC 20560-0105, USA.
Nicholas J RedaBiology Department, University of Wisconsin-La Crosse, La Crosse, WI 54601, USA.
Trevor J RiversDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Kansas Lawrence, KS 66045, USA.
James G MorinDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14850, USA.
Elizabeth TorresDepartment of Biological Sciences, California State University Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90032, USA.
Gretchen A GerrishBiology Department, University of Wisconsin-La Crosse, La Crosse, WI 54601, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6192-5734
Todd H OakleyDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4478-915X
University of California, Santa Barbara · USCalifornia State University Los Angeles · USCornell University · USScripps Institution of Oceanography · USSmithsonian Institution · USUniversity of Kansas · USUniversity of Wisconsin–La Crosse · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although the diversity, beauty, and intricacy of sexually selected courtship displays command the attention of evolutionists, the longevity of these traits in deep time is poorly understood. Population-based theory suggests sexual selection could either lower or raise extinction risk, resulting in high or low persistence of lineages with sexually selected traits. Furthermore, empirical studies that directly estimate the longevity of sexually selected traits are uncommon. Sexually selected signals-including bioluminescent courtship-originated multiple times during evolution, allowing the empirical study of their longevity after careful phylogenetic and divergence time analyses. Here, we estimate the first transcriptome-based molecular phylogeny and divergence times of Cypridinidae. We report extreme longevity of bioluminescent courtship, a trait important in mate choice and probably under sexual selection. Our relaxed-clock estimates of divergence times coupled with stochastic character mapping show luminous courtship evolved only once in Cypridinidae-in a Sub-Tribe, we name Luxorina-at least 151 millions of years ago from cypridinid ancestors that used bioluminescence only in antipredator displays, defining a Tribe we name Luminini. This time-calibrated molecular phylogeny of cypridinids will serve as a foundation for integrative and comparative studies on the biochemistry, molecular evolution, courtship, diversification, and ecology of cypridinid bioluminescence. The persistence of luminous courtship for hundreds of millions of years suggests that sexual selection did not cause a rapid loss of associated traits, and that rates of speciation within the group exceeded extinction risk, which may contribute to the persistence of a diverse clade of signaling species. [Ancestral state reconstruction; Biodiversity; co-option; divergence time estimates; macroevolution; Ostracoda; phylogenomics; sexual selection.].

Indexed as

CourtshipCrustaceaAnimalsBiodiversityEcologyPhylogeny

Identifiers

PMID35984328
PMCPMC10448971
OpenAlexW4294349293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.