Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35983754›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2022

An analytical method to separate modality-specific and nonspecific sensory components of event-related potentials.

Elizabeth Loreley Young, Christian Ariel Mista, Fabricio Ariel Jure, Ole Kaeseler Andersen, José A Biurrun Manresa

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06905171 (Analysis of Brain Responses and Habituation to Multimodal Sensory Stimuli in Patients With Fibromyalgia), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06905171 completednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Analysis of Brain Responses and Habituation to Multimodal Sensory Stimuli in Patients With Fibromyalgia

TypeobservationalSponsorNational Council of Scientific and Technical Research, ArgentinaRan2025 to 2025Enrolled26ConditionsFibromyalgiaArmsAuditory Stimulation, Visual Stimulation, Somatosensory Stimulation, Auditory-Visual Stimulation, Visual-Somatosensory Stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elizabeth Loreley YoungInstitute for Research and Development in Bioengineering and Bioinformatics (IBB), CONICET-UNER, Oro Verde, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0003-0769-6955
Christian Ariel MistaInstitute for Research and Development in Bioengineering and Bioinformatics (IBB), CONICET-UNER, Oro Verde, Argentina.
Fabricio Ariel JureNeurorehabilitation Systems, Department of Health Science and Technology (HST), Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Ole Kaeseler AndersenCentre for Neuroplasticity and Pain (CNAP), Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
José A Biurrun ManresaInstitute for Research and Development in Bioengineering and Bioinformatics (IBB), CONICET-UNER, Oro Verde, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0003-4060-9665

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several models have been developed to analyse cortical activity in response to salient events constituted by multiple sensory modalities. In particular, additive models compare event-related potentials (ERPs) in response to stimuli from two or more concomitant sensory modalities with the ERPs evoked by unimodal stimuli, in order to study sensory interactions. In this approach, components that are not specific to a sensory modality are commonly disregarded, although they likely carry information about stimulus expectation and evaluation, attentional orientation and other cognitive processes. In this study, we present an analytical method to assess the contribution of modality-specific and nonspecific components to the ERP. We developed an experimental setup that recorded ERPs in response to four stimulus types (visual, auditory, and two somatosensory modalities to test for stimulus specificity) in three different conditions (unimodal, bimodal and trimodal stimulation) and recorded the saliency of these stimuli relative to the sensory background. Stimuli were delivered in pairs, in order to study the effects of habituation. To this end, spatiotemporal features (peak amplitudes and latencies at different scalp locations) were analysed using linear mixed models. Results showed that saliency relative to the sensory background increased with the number of concomitant stimuli. We also observed that the spatiotemporal features of modality-specific components derived from this method likely reflect the amount and type of sensory input. Furthermore, the nonspecific component reflected habituation occurring for the second stimulus in the pair. In conclusion, this method provides an alternative to study neural mechanisms of responses to multisensory stimulation.

Indexed as

ElectroencephalographyEvoked PotentialsAcoustic StimulationAttentionPhotic StimulationReaction Timeelectroencephalogramhabituationmultisensory stimulationsaliency

Identifiers

PMID35983754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.