Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35983700›Full record

ArticleTrends in hearing

Effect of Frequency Response Manipulations on Musical Sound Quality for Cochlear Implant Users.

Jonathan Mo, Nicole T Jiam, Mickael L D Deroche, Patpong Jiradejvong, Charles J Limb

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trends in hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jonathan MoDavis School of Medicine, 8785University of California, Sacramento, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2389-2844
Nicole T JiamDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, San Francisco School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Mickael L D DerocheDepartment of Psychology, 5618Concordia University, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8698-2249
Patpong JiradejvongDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, San Francisco School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Charles J LimbDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, San Francisco School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
University of California, San Francisco · USConcordia University · CAUniversity of California, Davis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cochlear implant (CI) users commonly report degraded musical sound quality. To improve CI-mediated music perception and enjoyment, we must understand factors that affect sound quality. In the present study, we utilize frequency response manipulation (FRM), a process that adjusts the energies of frequency bands within an audio signal, to determine its impact on CI-user sound quality assessments of musical stimuli. Thirty-three adult CI users completed an online study and listened to FRM-altered clips derived from the top songs in Billboard magazine. Participants assessed sound quality using the MUltiple Stimulus with Hidden Reference and Anchor for CI users (CI-MUSHRA) rating scale. FRM affected sound quality ratings (SQR). Specifically, increasing the gain for low and mid-range frequencies led to higher quality ratings than reducing them. In contrast, manipulating the gain for high frequencies (those above 2 kHz) had no impact. Participants with musical training were more sensitive to FRM than non-musically trained participants and demonstrated preference for gain increases over reductions. These findings suggest that, even among CI users, past musical training provides listeners with subtleties in musical appraisal, even though their hearing is now mediated electrically and bears little resemblance to their musical experience prior to implantation. Increased gain below 2 kHz may lead to higher sound quality than for equivalent reductions, perhaps because it offers greater access to lyrics in songs or because it provides more salient beat sensations.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantationCochlear ImplantsMusicAdultAuditory PerceptionHumansSoundcochlear implantfrequency response manipulationmusicsound quality

Identifiers

PMID35983700
PMCPMC9393940
OpenAlexW4292285917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.