ArticleHealth science reports2022
Evaluation of the effectiveness of platelet crossmatching by the solid-phase red cell adherence assay in adult patients of a tertiary care hospital in Thailand: A retrospective study.
Article in Health science reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- A quasi-experimental study evaluating the efficacy of crossmatch-matched platelet transfusions in hemato-oncology patients with suspected alloimmune platelet refractoriness: A single-centre experience.Transfusion medicine (Oxford, England) · 2026Trial
- Personalized management of platelet transfusion refractoriness: risk factors, cross-matching, and IVIG strategies.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Evaluation of the effectiveness of platelet crossmatching by the solid-phase red cell adherence assay in adult patients of a tertiary care hospital in Thailand: A retrospective study.Health science reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Platelet transfusion refractoriness is well aware to be associated with poor clinical outcomes. Patients with the alloantibody causing refractoriness required cross-matched compatible products to improve the platelet number. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and availability of platelet crossmatching provided by the solid-phase red cell adherence (SPRCA) technique in the context of a tertiary university hospital. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed of the records of 214 patients with platelet refractoriness in Siriraj Hospital, a tertiary university hospital in Thailand, between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2020. Results: The SPRCA technique successfully provided cross-matched compatible platelets to 114 patients (69.7%). Platelet crossmatching significantly improved the platelet counts, as shown by the increased 1- and 24-h corrected-count increments ( Conclusion: The SPRCA method can provide a high availability rate of cross-matched platelets, which is effective at stopping and preventing clinical bleeding conditions. This method is appropriate to apply for platelet crossmatching in the context of a hospital blood bank.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.