ArticleComputational and mathematical methods in medicine2022
Application of CT Postprocessing Reconstruction Technique in Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Solitary Pulmonary Nodules and Analysis of Risk Factors.
Article in Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Proposal of Modified Lung-RADS in Assessing Pulmonary Nodules of Patients with Previous Malignancies: A Primary Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Retracted: Application of CT Postprocessing Reconstruction Technique in Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Solitary Pulmonary Nodules and Analysis of Risk Factors.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-06-28Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Human Subject Welfare · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Lack of IRB/IACUC Approval and/or Compliance · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the application of CT postprocessing reconstruction technique in differential diagnosis of benign and malignant solitary pulmonary nodules and analysis of risk factors. Methods: A total of 150 solitary pulmonary nodules (SPN) patients admitted to our hospital from January 2020 to January 2022 were selected and divided into the benign SPN group ( Results: The pathological results of this study showed that there were 64 cases with benign SPN and 86 cases with malignant SPN. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive rate, and negative predictive rate of CT postprocessing reconstruction technology in diagnosing malignant SPN were 73.44%, 89.53%, 82.67%, 83.39%, and 81.91%, respectively, which were higher than 56.25%, 65.12%, 61.33%, 54.55%, and 66.67% of CT plain scan, and the difference was statistically significant ( Conclusion: CT postprocessing reconstruction technique has high diagnostic value in the differentiation of benign and malignant SPN, age ≥ 60 years, nodule diameter ≥ 15 mm, lobulation signs, burr signs, ground-glass components, and noncalcification components are independent risk factors for malignant SPN.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.