ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering
Recovery of complete time density curves from incomplete angiographic data using recurrent neural networks.
Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Quantitative angiography is a 2D/3D x-ray imaging modality that summarizes hemodynamic information using time density curve (TDC) based parameters. Estimation of the TDC parameters are susceptible to errors due to various factors including, patient motion, incomplete temporal data, imaging trigger errors etc. In this study, we tested the feasibility of using recurrent neural networks (RNN) to recover complete TDC temporal information from incomplete sequences and evaluate quantitative parameters generated from the corrected TDCs. Digital subtraction angiograms (DSAs) were collected from patients undergoing endovascular treatments and angiographic parametric imaging (API) parameters were calculated from each DSA. Each set of API parameters was used to simulate a TDC resulting in a dataset of 760 TDCs. One-third of each TDC was continuously masked from pseudo-random points past the peak height (PH) point to simulate missing/artifact information. An RNN was developed, trained and tested to generate completed/corrected TDCs. The RNN recovered complete TDC temporal information with an average mean squared error of 0.0086±0.002. Average mean absolute errors were calculated between each API parameter generated from the ground truth TDCs and RNN corrected TDCs, these were 11.02%±0.91 for time to peak, 10.97%±0.69 for mean transit time, 5.65%±0.76 for PH, and 15.08%±0.98 for area under the TDC. The change in API parameters was not clinically significant and the predictive power of the API parameters was retained. This study proved the feasibility of using RNNs to mitigate motion artifacts and incomplete angiographic acquisitions to extract accurate quantitative parameters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.