Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35983442›Full record

ArticleJournal of Taibah University Medical Sciences2022

The barriers of scientific research in physiotherapy.

Najla F Alsiri, Fatimah H Alansari, Aminah H Sadeq

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Najla F AlsiriPhysical Therapy and Rehabiliation Department, Al-Razi Orthopedics and Rehabilitation Hospital, Kuwait.
Fatimah H AlansariPhysical Therapy and Rehabiliation Department, Alrashed Allergy Center, Kuwait.
Aminah H SadeqDepartment of Physical Therapy, Kuwait University, Kuwait.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Scientific discoveries and updates are increasingly needed to enhance how healthcare is conducted and implemented for various specialties. Research in physiotherapy in Kuwait is limited. The study aimed to explore the barriers to research in physiotherapy in Kuwait. Methods: A cross-sectional research design and an online questionnaire method were used. The ethics committee of Kuwait's Ministry of Health approved the study (ref. 2019/1076). The questionnaire was constructed on the basis of an intensive literature review. Expert committee meetings were held to approve the items and review the content, accuracy and construction. The questionnaire consisted of four domains: participants' characteristics, research background, research barriers and encouragement for future research. Results: Of the 311 physiotherapists who responded to the questionnaire, 67% were women, and 80% were 25-44 years of age. A total of 55% of the participants read academic articles monthly. The major research barriers were lack of time (45%), followed by lack of research skills (41%) and lack of resources (40%). Other identified factors included workload (29%), difficulties in gaining ethical approval (27%), lack of motivation (26%), lack of support (25%), lack of participants (22%) and lifetime responsibilities (21%). Respondents indicated that encouragement for future research came from research workshops and lectures (75%), awards and recognition (52%), and encouragement from the department heads (45%). Conclusion: Physiotherapy research can be advanced in Kuwait by targeting the barriers identified herein, to strengthen physiotherapy research and advance the physiotherapy profession.

Indexed as

BarriersKuwaitPhysiotherapyQuestionnaireResearch

Identifiers

PMID35983442
PMCPMC9356374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.