Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35983408›Full record

ArticleDisease markers2022

Correlation of the Phase Angle with Muscle Ultrasound and Quality of Life in Obese Females.

David Primo, Olatz Izaola, J J López Gómez, Daniel de Luis

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Disease markers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Future lines of research on phase angle: Strengths and limitations.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

David PrimoCenter of Investigation of Endocrinology and Clinical Nutrition, Medicine School, University of Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3474-0766
Olatz IzaolaCenter of Investigation of Endocrinology and Clinical Nutrition, Medicine School, University of Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1201-4875
J J López GómezCenter of Investigation of Endocrinology and Clinical Nutrition, Medicine School, University of Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3144-343X
Daniel de LuisCenter of Investigation of Endocrinology and Clinical Nutrition, Medicine School, University of Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1745-9315
Universidad de Valladolid · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Phase angle (PhA) has been suggested to be an indicator of body cell mass and nutritional status. Clinically, the phase angle supposedly reflects body cell mass and cell membrane function, and the higher the phase angle, the better is the cell function. Muscle ultrasound (US) is an emerging nutritional assessment technique. Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the usefulness and correlation of PhA with muscle US of quadriceps rectus femoris (QRF) in obese female subjects and the relationship with quality of life and physical performance. Results: In total, 50 female obese patients were included with a mean age of 45.9 ± 2.4 years. The mean body mass index was 32.1 ± 1.6 kg/m Conclusion: PhA was correlated with muscle area, muscle circumference, muscle echo intensity, serum protein, quality of life SF-36, and strength physical performance.

Indexed as

Body CompositionQuality of LifeAdultElectric ImpedanceFemaleHumansMiddle AgedMusclesObesity

Identifiers

PMID35983408
PMCPMC9381286
OpenAlexW4290767571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.