Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35983334›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2022

Contribution of omics to biopreservation: Toward food microbiome engineering.

Frédéric Borges, Romain Briandet, Cécile Callon, Marie-Christine Champomier-Vergès, Souad Christieans, Sarah Chuzeville, Catherine Denis, Nathalie Desmasures, Marie-Hélène Desmonts, Carole Feurer and 10 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Camel milkFrontiers in nutrition · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. OMICS and Other Advanced Technologies in Mycological Applications.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Frédéric BorgesUniversité de Lorraine, LIBio, Nancy, France.
Romain BriandetUniversité Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, Micalis Institute, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Cécile CallonUniversité Clermont Auvergne, INRAE, VetAgro Sup, UMR 545 Fromage, Aurillac, France.
Marie-Christine Champomier-VergèsUniversité Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, Micalis Institute, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Souad ChristieansADIV, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Sarah ChuzevilleACTALIA, Pôle d'Expertise Analytique, Unité Microbiologie Laitière, La Roche sur Foron, France.
Catherine DenisACTALIA, Sécurité des Aliments, Saint Lô, France.
Nathalie DesmasuresNormandie Univ, UNICAEN, UNIROUEN, ABTE, Caen, France.
Marie-Hélène DesmontsAerial, Illkirch, France.
Carole FeurerIFIP, Institut de la Filière Porcine, Le Rheu, France.
Françoise LeroiIfremer, MASAE, Laboratoire EM3B, Nantes, France.
Sabine LeroyUniversité Clermont Auvergne, INRAE, MEDIS, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Jérôme MounierUniv Brest, Laboratoire Universitaire de Biodiversité et Ecologie Microbienne, Plouzané, France.
Delphine PasseriniIfremer, MASAE, Laboratoire EM3B, Nantes, France.
Marie-France PiletOniris, INRAE, SECALIM, Nantes, France.
Margot SchlusselhuberNormandie Univ, UNICAEN, UNIROUEN, ABTE, Caen, France.
Valérie StahlAerial, Illkirch, France.
Caroline StrubQualisud, Univ Montpellier, Avignon Université, CIRAD, Institut Agro, IRD, Université de La Réunion, Montpellier, France.
Régine TalonUniversité Clermont Auvergne, INRAE, MEDIS, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Monique ZagorecOniris, INRAE, SECALIM, Nantes, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biopreservation is a sustainable approach to improve food safety and maintain or extend food shelf life by using beneficial microorganisms or their metabolites. Over the past 20 years, omics techniques have revolutionised food microbiology including biopreservation. A range of methods including genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics and meta-omics derivatives have highlighted the potential of biopreservation to improve the microbial safety of various foods. This review shows how these approaches have contributed to the selection of biopreservation agents, to a better understanding of the mechanisms of action and of their efficiency and impact within the food ecosystem. It also presents the potential of combining omics with complementary approaches to take into account better the complexity of food microbiomes at multiple scales, from the cell to the community levels, and their spatial, physicochemical and microbiological heterogeneity. The latest advances in biopreservation through omics have emphasised the importance of considering food as a complex and dynamic microbiome that requires integrated engineering strategies to increase the rate of innovation production in order to meet the safety, environmental and economic challenges of the agri-food sector.

Indexed as

biopreservationfermentationfoodmicrobiomepathogensafetyshelf lifespoilage

Identifiers

PMID35983334
PMCPMC9379315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.