ReviewInfection and drug resistance2022
Safety and Efficacy of Antiviral Drugs for the Treatment of COVID-19: A Systematic Review.
Review in Infection and drug resistance, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Causal relationship between COVID-19, vaccination, and 20 digestive diseases: a comprehensive two-sample Mendelian randomization study.Virology journal · 2025Pooled it
- Computational Investigation of Novel pUL56 Ligands Using Docking and Molecular Dynamics with Preliminary Cytotoxicity Evaluation: An Early-Stage Study.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Beyond the Virus: The Collateral Impact of COVID-19 on Antimicrobial Consumption, Microbial Resistance, and Pharmacoeconomics.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Observational
- Electrophysiological and sick sinus syndrome effects of Remdesivir challenge in guinea-pig hearts.Frontiers in physiology · 2024Article
- Article
- Viral target and metabolism-based rationale for combined use of recently authorized small molecule COVID-19 medicines: Molnupiravir, nirmatrelvir, and remdesivir.Fundamental & clinical pharmacology · 2023Review
- SARS-CoV-2 Evasion of the Interferon System: Can We Restore Its Effectiveness?International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the efficacy and safety of antiviral drugs in the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Methods: All clinical trials of antiviral drug treatment for COVID-19 from December 2019 to December 2021 in CNKI, PubMed, Embase, Wanfang and VIP databases were searched by computer, and the results were systematically reviewed. Results: A total of 21 studies were included, including 5 randomized controlled studies, 5 non-randomized controlled studies, 3 retrospective cohort studies, 6 retrospective case series studies, and 2 observational studies, with a total of 2118 patients. The evaluated drugs included Ridzevir, Lopinavir/Ritonavir, Jingluwa, Fapiravi, Abidor, Danorivir, and interferon α. The evaluated antiviral drugs did not show superior efficacy for COVID-19 in clinical trials. In terms of safety, particular attention needs to be paid to the gastrointestinal side effects of lopinavir/ritonavir and the serious side effects of redsivir. Conclusion: There is no specific drug. Antiviral drugs have a greater therapeutic benefit for mild and usual patients, and in severe patients, lopinavir/ritonavir may not be effective. For critically ill patients, adefovir or more than two antiviral drugs can be used early. Antiviral drugs combined with traditional Chinese medicine treatment is effective. In view of the safety of the drug, it is necessary to consider the increase of serum uric acid caused by fapravi, the increase of bilirubin caused by abidol, and the gastrointestinal reactions of pitavir. In addition, other adverse reactions should also be noted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.