Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35983244›Full record

ArticleBioMed research international2022

A Single-Center Treatment Experience of Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Optic Pathway Glioma.

Youlin Ge, Zhiyuan Zhang, Yanhe Li, Yiguang Lin, Yongqing Zong, Dong Liu

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioMed research international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Youlin GeDepartment of Gamma Knife Center, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0659-4757
Zhiyuan ZhangDepartment of Gamma Knife Center, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Yanhe LiDepartment of Gamma Knife Center, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Yiguang LinDepartment of Gamma Knife Center, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Yongqing ZongDepartment of Gamma Knife Center, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Dong LiuDepartment of Gamma Knife Center, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3796-9793
Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the independent prognostic factors that will influence the local tumor control/visual acuity (VA) preservation of optic pathway glioma (OPG) after Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKS) and to optimize the treatment strategy. Methods: A cohort of 52 consecutive OPG patients who underwent GKS in our center between August 1997 and September 2020 was studied retrospectively. Risk factors such as age at GKS, gender, tumor subtype, tumor site, tumor volume, intratumoral cyst formation, and marginal dose were selected for the univariate and multivariate analysis. COX proportional hazard models were built to determine the independent prognostic factors of local tumor control/VA preservation, and the Kaplan-Meier (K-M) curves were plotted to compare the survival rate among subgroups. Results: 52 OPG patients were included in this study, with a median age of 13.8 years (2-53 years); female outnumbered male at a ratio of 30 : 22; 7 patients (13.5%) had a history of surgical resection; 14 patients (26.9%) were categorized as neurofibromatosis type I (NFI) associated OPG and the rest as sporadic OPG; there were 6 patients (11.5%) with tumors located at hypothalamus/optic chiasm and the rest located in the orbit; the mean tumor volume was 4.36 ml (0.25-11.4 ml); 49 patients (94.2%) presented with VA impairment before GKS; 28 patients (53.8%) underwent single fraction GKS, and the rest underwent fractionated GKS (2-4 fractions); the mean marginal dose (represented with biologically effective dose, BED) was 66.6 Gy (13.3-126.0 Gy); the median follow-up time was 39 months (6-147 months); 11 patients were observed with tumor relapse, 33 with stable disease, and 8 with tumor regression; tumor relapse time varied from 30 to 76 months (mean 54 months); the 1-, 3-, and 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 100%, 92%, and 78%, respectively; 30 patients were included in the visual analysis; 7 patients were observed with VA deterioration, 19 with stable VA, and 4 with VA improvement; the 1-,3-, and 5-year VA preservation rates were 92%, 84%, and 77%, respectively. COX proportional hazard risk models showed that intratumoral cyst formation and marginal dose were the only two independent prognostic factors of local tumor control/VA preservation; fractionated GKS provided a higher VA preservation rate than single fraction GKS. Four patients were observed with conjunctive edema/conjunctive hyperemia in 1-4 weeks after GKS. Conclusions: GKS is a safe and effective treatment for OPG either as initial treatment or as salvage treatment after surgical resection, it provides good local tumor control and VA preservation, and fractionated GKS could be a preference for OPG patients with baseline VA ≥ 0.2.

Indexed as

CystsGliomaRadiosurgeryAdolescentFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID35983244
PMCPMC9381290
OpenAlexW4292685763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.