Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35983145›Full record

ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2022

Suitability Evaluation of Crop Variety via Graph Neural Network.

Qiusi Zhang, Bo Li, Yong Zhang, Shufeng Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Qiusi ZhangInformation Technology Research Center, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100097, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5469-1802
Bo LiBeijing Key Laboratory of Multimedia and Intelligent Software Technology, Beijing Institute of Artificial Intelligence, Department of Information Science, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0608-1502
Yong ZhangBeijing Key Laboratory of Multimedia and Intelligent Software Technology, Beijing Institute of Artificial Intelligence, Department of Information Science, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6650-6790
Shufeng WangInformation Technology Research Center, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100097, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7624-9721

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the continuous growth of the global population, insufficient food production has become an urgent problem to be solved in most countries. At present, using artificial intelligence technology to improve suitability between land and crop varieties to increase crop yields has become a consensus among agricultural researchers. However, there are still many problems in existing works, such as limited crop phenotypic data and the poor performance of artificial intelligence models. In this regard, we take maize as an example to collect a large amount of environmental climate and crop phenotypic traits data at multiple experimental sites and construct an extensive dataset. Then, we introduce a graph neural network model to learn crop suitability evaluation and finally achieve a good evaluation effect. The evaluation results of the model can not only provide a reference for expert evaluation but also judge the suitability of the variety to other test trial sites according to the data of the current one, so as to guide future breeding experiments.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceCrops, AgriculturalAgricultureNeural Networks, ComputerTechnology

Identifiers

PMID35983145
PMCPMC9381238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.