Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35983111›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India

The clinical efficiency and safety of 60W superpulse thulium fiber laser in retrograde intrarenal surgery.

Chandra Mohan Vaddi, Paidakula Ramakrishna, Soundarya Ganeshan, Siddalinga Swamy, Hemnath Anandan, Manas Babu, Rakesh Panda

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06721975 (Prospective Single-center Study Comparing Thulium Fiber Laser to Pulsed Thulium), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06721975 narecruitingnot on this map

Prospective Single-center Study Comparing Thulium Fiber Laser to Pulsed Thulium:YAG Laser in the Ureteroscopic Treatment of Nephrolithiasis

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, San DiegoRan2024 to 2026Enrolled50ConditionsKidney Stones, NephrolithiasisArmsThulio pulsed Thulium:YAG (p-Tm:YAG), Thulium Laser Fiber (TFL)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Adoption of thulium fiber laser for lithotripsy A scoping review and bibliometric analysis.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Re: Vaddi CM, Ramakrishna P, Ganeshan S, Swamy S, Anandan H, Babu M,Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Chandra Mohan VaddiDepartment of Urology, Preeti Urology and Kidney Hospital, Remedy Hospital LN, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Paidakula RamakrishnaDepartment of Urology, Preeti Urology and Kidney Hospital, Remedy Hospital LN, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Soundarya GaneshanDepartment of Urology, Preeti Urology and Kidney Hospital, Remedy Hospital LN, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Siddalinga SwamyDepartment of Urology, Preeti Urology and Kidney Hospital, Remedy Hospital LN, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Hemnath AnandanDepartment of Urology, Preeti Urology and Kidney Hospital, Remedy Hospital LN, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Manas BabuDepartment of Urology, Preeti Urology and Kidney Hospital, Remedy Hospital LN, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Rakesh PandaDepartment of Urology, Preeti Urology and Kidney Hospital, Remedy Hospital LN, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Our aim is to evaluate the clinical efficiency and safety of 60W Thulium fiber laser (TFL) during retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS). The performance of the TFL across different ranges of stone volumes and stone densities is assessed. Materials and Methods: Between October 2019 and August 2020, a prospective study was done on 135 patients with < 20 mm renal stones, who underwent RIRS using TFL. Stone parameters, total laser time, total energy delivered (kJ), and fiber burn-back were recorded. Laser efficacy (J/mm Results: Data of 126 of 135 patients included in the study were analyzed. The mean patient age was 45.04 ± 12.30 years. Mean stone size was 15.19 ± 4.52 mm, and mean stone volume was 1061.85 ± 806.81 mm Conclusion: Superpulse TFL is efficient and safe. The work efficiency increases for larger volume stones. The work efficiency remains the same across different stone densities. No complication more than Clavien grade 2 was encountered.

Identifiers

PMID35983111
PMCPMC9380467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.