Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35983060›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2022

Utomilumab in Patients With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Refractory Melanoma and Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

David S Hong, Ajay K Gopal, Alexander N Shoushtari, Sandip P Patel, Aiwu R He, Toshihiko Doi, Suresh S Ramalingam, Amita Patnaik, Shahneen Sandhu, Ying Chen and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The next generation of immunotherapies for lung cancers.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2025
    Review
  3. 4-1BB Antibodies in Oncology Clinical Trials: A Review.Journal of immunotherapy and precision oncology · 2025
    Review
  4. Primary and Acquired Resistance to Immunotherapy with Checkpoint Inhibitors in NSCLC: From Bedside to Bench and Back.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 11 institutions in 3 countries.

David S HongDepartment of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, Division of Cancer Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Ajay K GopalNational Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Seattle, WA, United States.
Alexander N ShoushtariMelanoma Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States.
Sandip P PatelUniversity of California San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA, United States.
Aiwu R HeLombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, United States.
Toshihiko DoiNational Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan.
Suresh S RamalingamDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Amita PatnaikSTART San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, United States.
Shahneen SandhuDepartment of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and the University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Ying ChenPfizer Oncology, San Diego, CA, United States.
Craig B DavisPfizer Oncology, San Diego, CA, United States.
Timothy S FisherPfizer Oncology, San Diego, CA, United States.
Bo HuangPfizer Oncology, Groton, CT, United States.
Kolette D FlyPfizer Oncology, Groton, CT, United States.
Antoni RibasDepartment of Medicine, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Pfizer (United States) · USEmory University · USGeorgetown University Medical Center · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USNational Cancer Center · USNational Cancer Center Hospital East · JPPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre · AUSouth Texas Accelerated Research Therapeutics · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of California, San Diego · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Fabien Delerue · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Convalescent Plasma to Limit Coronavirus Associated ComplicationsUL1TR003167 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI KARP, DANIEL D, MCPHERSON, DAVID D · 2019 to 2023
$45.3M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR003167NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Section Head: Clinical/translational cancer immunotherapy. Background: The goal of this study was to estimate the objective response rate for utomilumab in adults with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-refractory melanoma and non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: Utomilumab was dosed intravenously every 4 weeks (Q4W) and adverse events (AEs) monitored. Tumor responses by RECIST1.1 were assessed by baseline and on-treatment scans. Tumor biopsies were collected for detection of programmed cell death ligand 1, CD8, 4-1BB, perforin, and granzyme B, and gene expression analyzed by next-generation sequencing. CD8+ T cells from healthy donors were stimulated with anti-CD3 ± utomilumab and compared with control. Results: Patients with melanoma (n=43) and NSCLC (n=20) received utomilumab 0.24 mg/kg (n=36), 1.2 mg/kg (n=26), or 10 mg/kg (n=1). Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) occurred in 55 (87.3%) patients and serious TEAEs in 18 (28.6%). Five (7.9%) patients discontinued owing to TEAEs. Thirty-two (50.8%) patients experienced treatment-related AEs, mostly grade 1-2. Objective response rate: 2.3% in patients with melanoma; no confirmed responses for patients with NSCLC. Ten patients each with melanoma (23.3%) or NSCLC (50%) had stable disease; respective median (95% confidence interval, CI) progression-free survival was 1.8 (1.7-1.9) and 3.6 (1.6-6.5) months. Utomilumab exposure increased with dose. The incidences of antidrug and neutralizing antibodies were 46.3% and 19.4%, respectively. Efficacy was associated with immune-active tumor microenvironments, and pharmacodynamic activity appeared to be blunted at higher doses. Conclusions: Utomilumab was well tolerated, but antitumor activity was low in patients who previously progressed on ICIs. The potential of 4-1BB agonists requires additional study to optimize efficacy while maintaining the tolerable safety profile.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsMelanomaAdultAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsImmunoglobulin GTumor MicroenvironmentAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsImmunoglobulin Gutomilumab4-1BB/CD137immune checkpoint inhibitormelanomaNSCLCutomilumab

Identifiers

PMID35983060
PMCPMC9379324
OpenAlexW4289519831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.