Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35983017›Full record

ArticleJournal of patient experience2022

Patient Satisfaction Among the OPD Attendees at a Secondary Care Hospital in Northern India.

Ravneet Kaur, Shashi Kant, Akhil Dhanesh Goel, Nitika Sharma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of patient experience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ravneet KaurCentre for Community Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8226-8614
Shashi KantCentre for Community Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Akhil Dhanesh GoelDepartment of Community Medicine and Family Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.
Nitika SharmaDepartment of Community Medicine, Kalpana Chawla Government Medical College, Karnal, Haryana, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patient satisfaction reflects the quality and effectiveness of healthcare. Healthcare services have become more patient-centric in today's era as patients are viewed as active consumers of healthcare services rather than passive recipients. Measuring patient satisfaction level has become an objective criterion for defining the effectiveness of these services. Feedback from patients makes healthcare services more responsive to the expectations of patients. We conducted a cross-sectional study among 200 OPD attendees of a secondary-care hospital to assess the level of satisfaction. A 5-point Likert scale was used to record the responses. For overall satisfaction with the OPD services, most common responses were "good" or "very-good", with mean (SD) score of 3.8 (0.77). Majority of the patients were satisfied with facilities such as drinking water and toilets, and with consultation time provided by the doctors. The patients were not satisfied with the time taken at the registration window and behavior of other hospital employees. This highlights the importance of reorientation training on communication and interpersonal skills for all categories of healthcare staff.

Indexed as

communicationpatient feedbackpatient satisfactionquality

Identifiers

PMID35983017
PMCPMC9380211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.