Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35982987›Full record

ArticleFemale pelvic medicine & reconstructive surgery2022

AUGS-PERFORM: A New Patient-Reported Outcome Measure to Assess Quality of Prolapse Care.

Michele O'Shea, Sarah Boyles, Catherine S Bradley, Kristin Jacobs, Molly McFatrich, Vivian Sung, Kevin Weinfurt, Nazema Y Siddiqui

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Female pelvic medicine & reconstructive surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Michele O'SheaDuke University Health System, Durham, NC.
Sarah BoylesThe Oregon Clinic, Portland, OR.
Catherine S BradleyUniversity of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA.
Kristin JacobsRush University, Chicago, IL.
Molly McFatrichDuke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.
Vivian SungAlpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI.
Kevin WeinfurtDuke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.
Nazema Y SiddiquiDuke University Health System, Durham, NC.

Funding

AHRQ HHS R13 HS026448
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) are important for measuring quality of care, particularly for interventions aimed at improving symptom bother such as procedures for pelvic organ prolapse. We aimed to create a concise yet comprehensive PRO measurement tool to assess pelvic organ prolapse care in high-volume clinical environments. Methods: The relevant concepts to measure prolapse treatment quality were first established through literature review, qualitative interviews, and a patient and provider-driven consensus-building process. Extant items mapping to these concepts, or domains, were identified from an existing pool of patient-reported symptoms and condition-specific and generic health-related quality of life measures. Item classification was performed to group items assessing similar concepts while eliminating items that were redundant, inconsistent with domains, or overly complex. A consensus meeting was held in March 2020 where patient and provider working groups ranked the remaining candidate items in order of relevance to measure prolapse treatment quality. After subsequent expert review, the revised candidate items underwent cognitive interview testing and were further refined. Results: Fifteen relevant PRO instruments were initially identified, and 358 items were considered for inclusion. After 2 iterative consensus reviews and 4 rounds of cognitive interviewing with 19 patients, 11 final candidate items were identified. These items map 5 consensus-based domains that include awareness and bother from prolapse, physical function, physical discomfort during sexual activity, pain, and urinary/defecatory symptoms. Conclusions: We present a concise set of candidate items that were developed using rigorous patient-centered methodology and a national consensus process, including urogynecologic patients and providers.

Indexed as

Pelvic Organ ProlapseQuality of LifeHumansPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresPsychometricspatient-reported outcomespelvic organ prolapsequality

Identifiers

PMID35982987
PMCPMC9365262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.