Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35982956›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

Bioinformatics analysis and experimental verification of the prognostic and biological significance mediated by fatty acid metabolism related genes for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Xiao-Ren Zhu, Jia-Qi Zhu, Yu-Fei Chen, Yuan-Yuan Liu, Jing-Jing Lu, Jun Sun, Shi-Qing Peng, Min-Bin Chen, Yi-Ping Du

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Xiao-Ren ZhuDepartment of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Affiliated Kunshan Hospital of Jiangsu University, Kunshan, China.
Jia-Qi ZhuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Medical School of Nantong University, Nantong, China.
Yu-Fei ChenDepartment of Hepatology, Infectious Diseases Hospital Affiliated with Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Yuan-Yuan LiuClinical Research and Lab Center, Affiliated Kunshan Hospital of Jiangsu University, Kunshan, China.
Jing-Jing LuDepartment of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Affiliated Kunshan Hospital of Jiangsu University, Kunshan, China.
Jun SunDepartment of Medical Oncology, Affiliated Kunshan Hospital of Jiangsu University, Medical School of Jiangsu University, Kunshan, China.
Shi-Qing PengDepartment of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Affiliated Kunshan Hospital of Jiangsu University, Kunshan, China.
Min-Bin ChenDepartment of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Affiliated Kunshan Hospital of Jiangsu University, Kunshan, China.
Yi-Ping DuDepartment of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Affiliated Kunshan Hospital of Jiangsu University, Kunshan, China.
Jiangsu University · CNFirst People's Hospital of Kunshan · CNAffiliated Hospital of Nantong University · CNSoochow University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Liver cancer is among the leading causes of death related to cancer around the world. The most frequent type of human liver cancer is hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Fatty acid (FA) metabolism is an emerging hallmark that plays a promoting role in numerous malignancies. This study aimed to discover a FA metabolism-related risk signature and formulate a better model for HCC patients' prognosis prediction. Methods: We collected mRNA expression data and clinical parameters of patients with HCC using the TCGA databases, and the differential FA metabolism-related genes were explored. To create a risk prognostic model, we carried out the consensus clustering as well as univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses. 16 genes were used to establish a prognostic model, which was then validated in the ICGC dataset. The accuracy of the model was performed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses, decision curve analysis (DCA) and nomogram. The immune cell infiltration level of risk genes was evaluated with single-sample GSEA (ssGSEA) algorithm. To reflect the response to immunotherapy, immunophenoscore (IPS) was obtained from TCGA-LIHC. Then, the expression of the candidate risk genes (p < 0.05) was validated by qRT-PCR, Western blotting and single-cell transcriptomics. Cellular function assays were performed to revealed the biological function of HAVCR1. Results: According to the TCGA-LIHC cohort analysis, the majority of the FA metabolism-related genes were expressed differentially in the HCC and normal tissues. The prognosis of patients with high-risk scores was observed to be worse. Multivariate COX regression analysis confirmed that the model can be employed as an independent prognosis factor for HCC patients. Furthermore, ssGSEA analysis revealed a link between the model and the levels of immune cell infiltration. Our model scoring mechanism also provides a high predictive value in HCC patients receiving anti-PDL1 immunotherapy. One of the FA metabolism-related genes, HAVCR1, displays a significant differential expression between normal and HCC cell lines. Hepatocellular carcinoma cells (Huh7, and HepG2) proliferation, motility, and invasion were all remarkably inhibited by HAVCR1 siRNA. Conclusion: Our study identified a novel FA metabolism-related prognostic model, revealing a better potential treatment and prevention strategy for HCC.

Indexed as

fatty acid metabolismHAVCR1hepatocellular carcinomaimmunotherapyprognosis modeltumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID35982956
PMCPMC9378871
OpenAlexW4289521966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.