Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35982868›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oral health2022

Mechanisms of immune evasion by head and neck cancer stem cells.

Flávia Caló Aquino Xavier, Jamerson Carvalho Silva, Camila Oliveira Rodini, Maria Fernanda Setubal Destro Rodrigues

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oral health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. The Host-index in patients undergoing upfront surgery and free flap reconstruction for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Flávia Caló Aquino XavierLaboratory of Oral Surgical Pathology, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, BA, Brazil.
Jamerson Carvalho SilvaLaboratory of Oral Surgical Pathology, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, BA, Brazil.
Camila Oliveira RodiniDepartment of Biological Sciences, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Maria Fernanda Setubal Destro RodriguesPostgraduate Program in Biophotonics Applied to Health Sciences, Nove de Julho University (UNINOVE), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Universidade Federal da Bahia · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Nove de Julho · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Different mechanisms are involved in immune escape surveillance driven by Oral and Head and Neck Cancer Stem Cells (HNCSCs). The purpose of this review is to show the most current knowledge regarding the main impact of HNCSCs on tumor evasion through immunosuppression, CSCs phenotypes and environmental signals, highlighting strategies to overcome immune evasion. The main results drive the participation of cell surface receptors and secreted products and ligands, the crosstalk between cells, and genetic regulation. The reduction in CD8

Indexed as

cancer stem cell (CSC)head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC)immune evasionimmune surveillanceimmunotherapy

Identifiers

PMID35982868
PMCPMC9378780
OpenAlexW4289524334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.