ArticleHeliyon2022
CFD simulations of respiratory airflow in human upper airways response to walking and running for oral breathing condition.
Article in Heliyon, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Forward Computational Modeling of Respiratory Airflow.Applied sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Engineering innovations in medicine and biology: Revolutionizing patient care through mechanical solutions.Heliyon · 2024Review
- A CFD-FFT approach to hemoacoustics that enables degree of stenosis prediction from stethoscopic signals.Heliyon · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Walking and running are common types of physical activities that people do in day to day living, to improve health and physical fitness or for recreation. During a physical activity, rate and depth of breathing increase because working muscles need extra oxygen in order to produce energy. In this study, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations were used to investigate respiratory airflow dynamics in human upper airways response to walking and running for oral breathing. The numerical simulations were done in a realistic CT-scan airway model using ANAYS Fluent 19.0 software. Flow fields were analysed numerically and flow patterns were investigated in the airway model during inspiration and expiration response to walking and running. The axial velocity distributions and secondary flow patterns for the two respiratory phases were analysed response to the two physical activities at different cross-sections of the airway model. The maximum velocity, wall pressure and wall shear stress values for running were respectively 3.2, 9.4 and 5.9 times higher than that of walking during inspiration. The mixing of flow streamlines was observed to be higher during running than walking because of more significant turbulence. More skewed flows at airway curvatures were observed at inspiration than expiration. The results of this study supported the fact that running is a more intense activity than walking from a respiratory dynamics point of view.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.