ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2022
Optimization of the Grashey View Radiograph for Critical Shoulder Angle Measurement: A Reliability Assessment With Zero Echo Time MRI.
Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- New Measurement Method for Lateral Acromial Protrusion as an Alternative to Critical Shoulder Angle, Independent of Sagittal Glenoid Tilt.Clinics in orthopedic surgery · 2026Article
- Automated Shoulder Radiograph Quality Review to Support Efficient Workflow in the Emergency Department: The SQUIRE Deep Learning Ensemble.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- ZTE MRI for Rotator Cuff Tear Arthropathy: Integrated Bone-Muscle Analysis and Its Association with Pseudoparesis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Advances in Shoulder Pain Imaging: A Narrative Review of Current Practice and Emerging Trends.Current medical imaging · 2025Article
- Feasibility of MRI with zero echo time (ZTE) sequence for personalized preoperative assessment of distances between critical nerves and glenoid landmarks.Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA · 2025Article
- Investigating the Role of Symptom Duration and Critical Shoulder Angle in Predicting Acromiohumeral Interval Reversibility in Patients With Massive Rotator Cuff Tears.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2025Article
- Enhanced bone assessment of the shoulder using zero-echo time MRI with deep-learning image reconstruction.Skeletal radiology · 2024Article
- Predictability and functional impact of lateral acromioplasty using preoperative 2D planning on the correction of the critical shoulder angle (CSA) in patients with rotator cuff repair.JSES international · 2024Article
- Glenoid morphology variation between patients with hypermobile shoulder joints and controls: Identification of hyperlaxity-related morphologic bone changes.Research in diagnostic and interventional imaging · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Suboptimal positioning on Grashey view radiographs may limit the prognosticating potential of the critical shoulder angle (CSA) for shoulder disorders. Purpose: To investigate whether radiography optimized according to the latest research is reliable for measuring CSA in comparison with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) featuring 3-dimensional (3D) zero echo time (ZTE) sequencing, which accentuates the contrast between cortical bone and surrounding soft tissue with high fidelity. Study Design: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2. Methods: Patients with shoulder pain were prospectively and consecutively enrolled. All patients had Grashey view radiographs as well as 3.0-T MRI scans with isotropic 3D ZTE sequencing. Acceptable positioning on the radiographs was determined using the ratio of the transverse to longitudinal (RTL) diameter of the lateral glenoid outline; radiographs with an RTL ≥0.25 were repeated. Two observers independently measured the CSA on the radiographs and the coronal oblique reformatted ZTE images, the latter including verification of measurement points by cross-referencing against images from other planes. Reliability of measurements between observers and modalities was analyzed with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The paired-samples Results: Enrolled were 65 patients (35 female and 30 male; mean age, 40.2 years; range, 25-49 years). Radiographs with optimal positioning (RTL < 0.25) were attained after a mean of 1.6 exposures (range, 1-4); the mean RTL was 0.09 (range, 0-0.20). Interobserver agreement of CSA was excellent for radiographs (ICC = 0.91; 95% CI, 0.84-0.94) and good for ZTE MRI scans (ICC = 0.85; 95% CI, 0.71-0.92). Intermodality agreement of CSA between radiographs and ZTE MRI scans was moderate (ICC = 0.66; 95% CI, 0.48-0.73). The CSA was significantly different between an optimal radiograph (30.7° ± 4.3°) and ZTE MRI scan (31.8° ± 3.8) ( Conclusion: CSA measurement on ZTE MRI scans with anatomic point cross-referencing was significantly different from that on Grashey view radiographs, even with optimal positioning, and radiography may necessitate more than 1 exposure. An RTL of <0.1 ensured reliability of radiographs when other standards of sufficient x-ray exposure were met.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.