Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35982818›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of nuclear medicine : IJNM : the official journal of the Society of Nuclear Medicine, India

Navjot Kaur, Rajender Kumar, Nivedita Rana, Venkata Subramanian Krishnaraju, Bhagwant Rai Mittal

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of nuclear medicine : IJNM : the official journal of the Society of Nuclear Medicine, India. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 88% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Navjot KaurDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and PET/CT, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Rajender KumarDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and PET/CT, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Nivedita RanaDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and PET/CT, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Venkata Subramanian KrishnarajuDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and PET/CT, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Bhagwant Rai MittalDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and PET/CT, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Materials and Methods: We prospectively evaluated the retrieved tissue specimens during PET/CT-guided biopsies for the presence of radioactivity. The qualitative radioactivity was measured by acquiring PET/CT images of the specimen. For quantitative analysis, a multichannel-analyzer (MCA) was used, and a counting-factor (CF) in counts/mCi.mm Results: A total of 49 patients (30 males) aged 51.8 ± 17.8 years were recruited for the biopsy, and radioactivity was measured. All the specimens revealed the presence of radioactivity on PET/CT images of the specimens and MCA counting. The mean CF-values were 17.2 ± 15.6 counts/mCi.mm Conclusion: The

Indexed as

Biopsyex vivofluorodeoxyglucosepositron emission tomography computed tomographyradioactivity

Identifiers

PMID35982818
PMCPMC9380811
OpenAlexW4285272607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.