Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35982817›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of nuclear medicine : IJNM : the official journal of the Society of Nuclear Medicine, India

Optimum Value of Scale and Threshold for Compression of 99mTc-MDP Bone Scan Images using

Anil Kumar Pandey, Jagrati Chaudhary, Akshima Sharma, Hemakshi Chetan Patel, Param Dev Sharma, Vivek Baghel, Rakesh Kumar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of nuclear medicine : IJNM : the official journal of the Society of Nuclear Medicine, India. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Near-lossless Compression of Tc-99 m DMSA Scan Images Using Discrete Cosine Transformation.Indian journal of nuclear medicine : IJNM : the official journal of the Society of Nuclear Medicine, India
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Anil Kumar PandeyDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Jagrati ChaudharyDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Akshima SharmaDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Hemakshi Chetan PatelDepartment of Mathematics, University of Delhi, India.
Param Dev SharmaDepartment of Computer Science, SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, New Delhi, India.
Vivek BaghelDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Rakesh KumarDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Wavelet transforms of an image result in set of wavelet coefficients. Thresholding eliminates insignificant coefficients while retaining the significant ones (resulting in matrix having few nonzero elements that need to be stored). The compressed image is reconstructed by applying inverse wavelet transform. The quality of compressed image deteriorates with increase in compression. Hence, finding optimum value of scale and threshold is a challenging task. The objective of the study was to find the optimum value of scale and threshold for compressing 99mTc-methylene diphosphonate (99 mTc-MDP) bone scan images using Materials and Methods: Haar wavelet transform at scale 1-8 was applied on 106 99 mTc-MDP whole-body bone scan images, and wavelet coefficients were threshold at 90, 95, 97, and 99 percentiles, followed by inverse wavelet transform to get 3392 compressed images. Nuclear medicine physician (NMP) compared compressed image with its corresponding input to label it as acceptable or unacceptable. The values of scale and threshold that resulted in majority of acceptable images were considered to be optimum. The quality of compressed image was also evaluated using perception image quality evaluator (PIQE) image quality metrics. Compression ratio was calculated by dividing the number of nonzero elements after thresholding wavelet coefficients by the number of nonzero elements in Results: NMP found quality of compressed images (obtained at scale 2 and 90 percentile threshold) identical to the quality of the corresponding input images. As per Conclusions: The optimum values of scale and threshold were determined to be 2 and 90 percentiles, respectively.

Indexed as

99mTc-methylene diphosphonate bone scan image compressionHaar wavelet transformimage compression

Identifiers

PMID35982817
PMCPMC9380794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.