ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering
Comparison of quantitative imaging characteristics between a new, larger-FOV 1000 fps high-speed angiographic (HSA) photon-counting detector (Aries) with a smaller HSA detector (Actaeon).
Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Photon counting-energy integrating hybrid flat panel detector systems for image-guided interventions: an experimental proof-of-concept.Physics in medicine and biology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
High Speed Angiography (HSA) requires imaging detectors with both high-temporal and high-spatial resolution. Both the Aries and Acteon detectors by Direct Conversion (Stockholm, Sweden) are CdTe direct photon-counting detectors (PCD) that have acquisition frame rates of up to 1000-fps and a 100-micrometer pixel pitch; however, the new Aries detector offers a larger field of view (512 × 768 pixels) compared to the smaller Actaeon detector (256 × 256 pixels). An expanded field of view is required for imaging of larger vasculature, thus the Aries offers this advantage. Evaluations were performed of both detectors under Anti-Coincidence Circuitry (ACC-ON) mode, which corrects for charge sharing between pixels. Initial evaluations of instrumentation noise and detector energy-threshold calibration using Am-241 gamma spectroscopy were performed for the new Aries detector. Linearity was also evaluated for the Aries for each of the 12 individual modules that compose the detector field to check for homogeneity in response to exposure throughout the detector. Finally, Normalized Noise Power Spectrum (NNPS), Modulation Transfer Function (MTF) and Detective Quantum Efficiency (DQE) were then compared between the Aries and Actaeon detectors at two different exposures and detector energy thresholds. The detectors are linear up to approximately 1000 μR and have no instrumentation noise above a threshold of 15 keV. As expected, the MTF's and DQE's are similar between the Aries and Actaeon detectors, and there are thus no tradeoff's in image quality to achieve the larger FOV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.