ArticlePostepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology2022
Sources of patients' knowledge about cardiovascular disease prevention in Poland - a pilot study.
Article in Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- AWARENESS OF HEART FAILURE AMONG PATIENTS ATTENDING CARDIOLOGY CLINIC OF A TERTIARY CENTRE IN IBADAN, SOUTH WESTERN NIGERIA.Annals of Ibadan postgraduate medicine · 2025Article
- Machine learning models using symptoms and clinical variables to predict coronary artery disease on coronary angiography.Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology · 2024Article
- Performance of ChatGPT in providing patient information about upper tract urothelial carcinoma.Contemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Education about coronary artery disease (CAD) is the basis of the prevention programs to limit the impact of CAD on patients' health. Aim: To identify patterns characterizing several groups of patients that might help to create targeted and more efficient education projects. Material and methods: Data were collected using a self-designed questionnaire assessing sociodemographic and clinical profile, sources of knowledge, and expectations about education on heart diseases. It was conducted among patients at the cardiology department and at the patients' congress. Data were collected between July 2016 and October 2018 at the cardiology department and 5-7 December 2018 during a patients' congress. Results: Of 486 respondents 74% were male, and the median age was 68 years (interquartile range (IQR): 62-73). History of CAD was reported by 68% of patients. Cardiologists were reported as a source of knowledge more often by men than women. Patients with higher education were more likely to use books and internet sources, but they relied less on education provided by cardiologists. Conclusions: Regardless of the sociodemographic or clinical factors, appointments with health care professionals were indicated as the most preferable form of education, and physicians were perceived as the most reliable and trusted source of knowledge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.