Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35982444›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2022

Longitudinal comparison of direct medical cost, radiological and health-related quality of life treatment outcomes between traditional growing rods and magnetically controlled growing rods from preoperative to maturity.

Prudence Wing Hang Cheung, Carlos King Ho Wong, Jewel T Sadiang-Abay, Sin Ting Lau, Jason Pui Yin Cheung

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Prudence Wing Hang CheungDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The University of Hong Kong, 5/F, Professorial Block, Queen Mary Hospital, Pokfulam, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Carlos King Ho WongDepartment of Family Medicine and Primary Care, The University of Hong Kong, Ap Lei Chau, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Jewel T Sadiang-AbayDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The University of Hong Kong, 5/F, Professorial Block, Queen Mary Hospital, Pokfulam, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Sin Ting LauDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The University of Hong Kong, 5/F, Professorial Block, Queen Mary Hospital, Pokfulam, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Jason Pui Yin CheungDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The University of Hong Kong, 5/F, Professorial Block, Queen Mary Hospital, Pokfulam, Hong Kong SAR, China. cheungjp@hku.hk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7052-0875

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMagnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR) have replaced traditional growing rods (TGR) in the past decade, however, a comparison of their direct costs and treatment outcomes based on real longitudinal data is lacking. This study aims to compare the direct cost and treatment outcomes between TGR and MCGR, whilst incorporating complications, reoperations and changes in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) throughout the entire treatment course.

methodsPatients with early onset scoliosis (EOS) who underwent initial growing rod surgery between 2003 and 2016 at a tertiary scoliosis clinic were studied with longitudinal data. Accumulated direct medical costs were calculated based on the unit cost of surgeries of each TGR and MCGR, costs incurred for any rod exchange or remedial surgery for post-operative complication. Treatment outcomes were evaluated via: Patient's HRQoL using SRS-22r questionnaire, and radiological parameters (including major curve correction, spine length gains, spinal balance) throughout the treatment until maturity.

resultsA total of 27 EOS patients (16 MCGR, 11 TGR) were studied. Total direct cost of index surgery for MCGR was HKD$223,108 versus lower cost of HKD$135,184 for TGR (p < 0.001). At 2-3 years post-index surgery, accumulative total direct medical cost of MCGR and TGR became most comparable (TGR:MCGR ratio = 1.010) and had reached neutrality between the two groups since. Radiological parameters had no intergroup differences at maturity. For HRQoL, TGR group had shown the trend of less pain (domain score mean difference: 0.53, p = 0.024) post-index surgery and better self-appearance (domain score mean difference: 1.08, p = 0.017) before fusion. Higher satisfaction with treatment (domain score mean difference: 0.76, p = 0.029) was demonstrated by TGR patients at fusion/maturity. MCGR had negative (r

conclusionsFrom index surgery to maturity, TGR demonstrated better satisfaction with treatment by patients and comparable overall HRQoL with MCGR during the treatment course, as MCGR did not show apparent benefit despite less surgeries and cost neutrality between the two groups at 2-3 years post-index surgery.

Indexed as

ScoliosisHumansProstheses and ImplantsQuality of LifeRadiographyRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeDirect costEarly onset scoliosisHRQoLMCGRTGRTreatment outcomes

Identifiers

PMID35982444
PMCPMC9386950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.