Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35982298›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2022

The quality of end-of-life care for Danish cancer patients who have received non-specialized palliative care: a national survey using the Danish version of VOICES-SF.

Lone Ross, Mette Asbjoern Neergaard, Morten Aagaard Petersen, Mogens Groenvold

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lone RossThe Palliative Care Research Unit, Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen NV, DK-2400, Denmark. Lone.Ross.Nylandsted@regionh.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4406-604X
Mette Asbjoern NeergaardPalliative Care Unit, Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Morten Aagaard PetersenThe Palliative Care Research Unit, Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen NV, DK-2400, Denmark.
Mogens GroenvoldThe Palliative Care Research Unit, Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen NV, DK-2400, Denmark.
Frederiksberg Hospital · DKAarhus University Hospital · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

Danish Cancer Society Research Center R114-A7227
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAbout half of Danish patients dying from cancer have never been in contact with specialized palliative care. Non-specialized palliative care in Denmark, i.e., somatic hospital departments, community nurses, and general practitioners, has rarely been described or evaluated. We aim to assess how non-specialized palliative care was evaluated by bereaved spouses, and to test whether distress when completing the questionnaire and ratings of aspects of end-of-life care was associated with satisfaction with place of death and overall quality of end-of-life care.

methodsBereaved spouses of 792 cancer patients who had received non-specialized palliative care were invited to answer the Views of Informal Carers-Evaluation of Services-Short Form (VOICES-SF) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) 3-9 months after the patient's death.

resultsA total of 280 (36%) of invited spouses participated. In the last 3 months of the patient's life, the quality of all services taken together was rated as good, excellent, or outstanding in 70% of the cases. Satisfaction was associated with respondent's current distress (p = 0.0004). Eighty percent of bereaved spouses believed that the patient had died in the right place. Satisfaction with place of death was associated with place of death (p = 0.012) and the respondent's current distress (p = 0.0016).

conclusionSatisfaction with place of death and overall quality of services was generally high but was rated lower by spouses reporting higher levels of distress when completing the questionnaire. Distress should be taken into account whenever services are evaluated by bereaved relatives.

Indexed as

BereavementNeoplasmsTerminal CareCaregiversDenmarkHumansPalliative CareSurveys and QuestionnairesCancerEnd-of-life carePalliative carePlace of deathSatisfaction with careSpouses

Identifiers

PMID35982298
OpenAlexW4293804598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.