Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35982262›Full record

ReviewArchives of pharmacal research2022

Predictive biomarkers for molecularly targeted therapies and immunotherapies in breast cancer.

Mi Jeong Kwon

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Archives of pharmacal research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mi Jeong KwonVessel-Organ Interaction Research Center, College of Pharmacy, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea. mjkwon94@knu.ac.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7599-878X
Kyungpook National University · KR

Funding

National Research Foundation NRF-2020R1A5A2017323National Research Foundation NRF-2022R1A2C1007293
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Globally, breast cancer is the most common malignancy in women. Substantial efforts have been made to develop novel therapies, including targeted therapies and immunotherapies, for patients with breast cancer who do not respond to standard therapies. Consequently, new targeted therapies, such as cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors, poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors, phosphoinositide 3-kinase inhibitor, and antibody-drug conjugates targeting human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 or trophoblast cell surface antigen-2, and immune checkpoint inhibitor targeting programmed cell death-1, have been developed and are now in clinical use. However, only some patients have benefited from these novel therapies; therefore, the identification and validation of reliable or more accurate biomarkers for predicting responses to these agents remain a major challenge. This review summarizes the currently available predictive biomarkers for breast cancer and describes recent efforts undertaken to identify potential predictive markers for molecularly targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsImmunoconjugatesCyclin-Dependent Kinase 4Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 6FemaleHumansImmunotherapyMolecular Targeted TherapyPhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase InhibitorsCyclin-Dependent Kinase 4Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 6Immune Checkpoint InhibitorsImmunoconjugatesPhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase InhibitorsBreast cancerImmune checkpoint inhibitorsMolecularly targeted therapiesPredictive biomarker

Identifiers

PMID35982262
OpenAlexW4292219968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.