Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35982103›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Association between cooking fuels and mild cognitive impairment among older adults from six low- and middle-income countries.

Lee Smith, Damiano Pizzol, Guillermo F López Sánchez, Karel Kostev, Hans Oh, Louis Jacob, Nicola Veronese, Benjamin R Underwood, Laurie Butler, Yvonne Barnett and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 51% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 9 institutions in 7 countries.

Lee SmithCentre for Health, Performance, and Wellbeing, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK.
Damiano PizzolItalian Agency for Development Cooperation, Gedaref, Khartoum, Sudan.
Guillermo F López SánchezDivision of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Department of Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain. gfls@um.es.
Karel KostevUniversity Hospital of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Hans OhSuzanne Dworak Peck School of Social Work, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, 90007, USA.
Louis JacobResearch and Development Unit, Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, CIBERSAM, ISCIII, 08830, Barcelona, Spain.
Nicola VeroneseChair for Biomarkers of Chronic Diseases, Biochemistry Department, College of Science King Saud University, Riyadh, 11451, Saudi Arabia.
Benjamin R UnderwoodCambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust, The Gnodde Goldman Sachs Translational Neuroscience Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Laurie ButlerCentre for Health, Performance, and Wellbeing, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK.
Yvonne BarnettCentre for Health, Performance, and Wellbeing, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK.
Mark A TullySchool of Medicine, Ulster University, Belfast, UK.
Ai KoyanagiResearch and Development Unit, Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, CIBERSAM, ISCIII, 08830, Barcelona, Spain.
Anglia Ruskin University · GBCambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust · GBKing Saud University · SAParc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu · ESPhilipps University of Marburg · DEUniversidad de Murcia · ESUniversité de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines · FRUniversity of Southern California · USUniversity of Ulster · GB

Funding

Towards improving the measurement of health and disability trends, the compressioR01AG034479 · NIA · WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION · PI CHATTERJI, SOMNATH · 2010 to 2014
$5.3M
Harmonizing health outcomes and determinants across longitudinal studies on agingR21AG034263 · NIA · WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION · PI CHATTERJI, SOMNATH, KOWAL, PAUL R. · 2011 to 2012
$255k
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG034479NIA NIH HHS R21 AG034263
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a small body of evidence suggesting that unclean cooking fuel use may be associated with cognitive decline. However, to date, no study has investigated the association between unclean cooking fuel and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Thus, we investigated the association between cooking fuel type or ventilation type and MCI among adults aged ≥ 65 years using nationally representative datasets from six low- and middle-income countries. Cross-sectional, community-based data from the World Health Organization (WHO) Study on global Ageing and adult health (SAGE) were analyzed. MCI was defined using the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association criteria. Unclean cooking fuel referred to kerosene/paraffin, coal/charcoal, wood, agriculture/crop, animal dung, and shrubs/grass. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to assess associations. Data on 13,623 individuals were analyzed [mean (SD) age 72.8 (11.0) years; 45.5% males]. Unclean cooking fuel (vs. clean cooking fuel) was associated with a significant 1.48 (95% CI = 1.08-2.03) times higher odds for MCI. Having no chimney or hood for cooking ventilation was also associated with significantly higher odds for MCI (OR = 1.88; 95% CI = 1.25-2.84). Unclean cooking fuel use and lack of chimney or hood for cooking ventilation were associated with higher odds for MCI. Findings support the implementation of the United Nations Sustainable Goal 7, which advocates affordable, reliable, sustainable, and modern energy for all, as this may also help reduce MCI and ultimately dementia.

Indexed as

Air Pollution, IndoorCognitive DysfunctionCoalCookingCross-Sectional StudiesDeveloping CountriesFemaleHumansMaleCoal

Identifiers

PMID35982103
PMCPMC9388480
OpenAlexW4292202275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.