Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35981770›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Current pesticide suicide surveillance methods used across the African continent: a scoping review protocol.

Maxine Brassell, Ayanthi Karunarathne, Leah Utyasheva, Michael Eddleston, Flemming Konradsen, Hanna-Andrea Rother

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Maxine BrassellDivision of Environmental Health, University of Cape Town Faculty of Health Sciences, Observatory, Western Cape, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-7327-3198
Ayanthi KarunarathneCentre for Pesticide Suicide Prevention, The University of Edinburgh The Queen's Medical Research Institute, Edinburgh, UK.
Leah UtyashevaCentre for Pesticide Suicide Prevention, The University of Edinburgh The Queen's Medical Research Institute, Edinburgh, UK.
Michael EddlestonCentre for Pesticide Suicide Prevention, The University of Edinburgh The Queen's Medical Research Institute, Edinburgh, UK.
Flemming KonradsenGlobal Health Section, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Hanna-Andrea RotherDivision of Environmental Health, University of Cape Town Faculty of Health Sciences, Observatory, Western Cape, South Africa andrea.rother@uct.ac.za.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEvery year, more than 800 000 people die from suicides of which an estimated 20% are from pesticide ingestion. Multiple studies have estimated that around 77%-80% of these pesticide suicides occur in low/middle-income countries. The full burden of pesticide suicides in African countries remains poorly documented, one reason being the lack of systematic data collection. It is essential to know the number of pesticide suicide cases to guide prevention of further cases occurring. This can be done by informing policy and legislation, and the implementation of targeted bans, as well as raising community awareness around the use of these pesticides, training of healthcare personnel, and influencing the type and level of clinical facility investments into this area of healthcare. The scoping review aims to investigate how pesticide suicide deaths in Africa are recorded by exploring the various surveillance systems in place, as well as highlighting key limitations and data collection barriers. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A scoping review will be carried out with the five-stage methodological frameworks set out by Arksey and O'Malley and the Joanna Briggs Institute. Studies in English that looked at pesticide suicide in African countries will be extracted and screened independently by two reviewers against the inclusion and exclusion criteria of this review. Studies' data will be extracted, and a descriptive synthesis developed of their main findings, as guided by the approach of Levac and colleagues. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval is not required for this review as no human participants will be involved. The study findings will be distributed in a peer-reviewed publication. REGISTRATION DETAILS: This protocol has been submitted for publication to

Indexed as

PesticidesSuicide PreventionDelivery of Health CareHumansPeer ReviewResearch DesignScoping Reviews as TopicPesticidesMENTAL HEALTHProtocols & guidelinesPUBLIC HEALTHRisk managementSuicide & self-harm

Identifiers

PMID35981770
PMCPMC9394204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.