Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35981737›Full record

ReviewRespirology (Carlton, Vic.)2022

Pulmonary function testing during SARS-CoV-2: An ANZSRS/TSANZ position statement.

Brigitte M Borg, Christian Osadnik, Keith Adam, David G Chapman, Catherine E Farrow, Vanda Glavas, Kerry Hancock, Celia J Lanteri, Ewan G Morris, Nicholas Romeo and 2 more

Abstract readReviewConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Review in Respirology (Carlton, Vic.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Brigitte M BorgRespiratory Medicine, The Alfred, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6412-3670
Christian OsadnikDepartment of Physiotherapy, Monash University, Frankston, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9040-8007
Keith AdamSonic HealthPlus, Osborne Park, Western Australia, Australia.
David G ChapmanRespiratory Investigation Unit, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8211-1817
Catherine E FarrowAirway Physiology & Imaging Group, Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, The University of Sydney, Glebe, New South Wales, Australia.
Vanda GlavasRespiratory SA, Kent Town, South Australia, Australia.
Kerry HancockChandlers Hill Surgery, Happy Valley, South Australia, Australia.
Celia J LanteriDepartment of Respiratory & Sleep Medicine, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.
Ewan G MorrisDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Waitematā District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand.
Nicholas RomeoDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Northern Health, Epping, Victoria, Australia.
Elena K Schneider-FutschikCystic Fibrosis Pharmacology Laboratory, Department of Biochemistry & Pharmacology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Hiran SelvaduraiDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, The Children's Hospital, Westmead, Sydney Childrens Hospital Network, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand (TSANZ) and the Australian and New Zealand Society of Respiratory Science (ANZSRS) commissioned a joint position paper on pulmonary function testing during coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in July 2021. A working group was formed via an expression of interest to members of both organizations and commenced work in September 2021. A rapid review of the literature was undertaken, with a 'best evidence synthesis' approach taken to answer the research questions formed. This allowed the working group to accept findings of prior relevant reviews or societal document where appropriate. The advice provided is for providers of pulmonary function tests across all settings. The advice is intended to supplement local infection prevention and state, territory or national directives. The working group's key messages reflect a precautionary approach to protect the safety of both healthcare workers (HCWs) and patients in a rapidly changing environment. The decision on strategies employed may vary depending on local transmission and practice environment. The advice is likely to require review as evidence grows and the COVID-19 pandemic evolves. While this position statement was contextualized specifically to the COVID-19 pandemic, the working group strongly advocates that any changes to clinical/laboratory practice, made in the interest of optimizing the safety and well-being of HCWs and patients involved in pulmonary function testing, are carefully considered in light of their potential for ongoing use to reduce transmission of other droplet and/or aerosol borne diseases.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2AustraliaHumansNew ZealandPandemicsRespiratory Function TestsaerosolCOVID-19personal protective equipmentpulmonary function testsrespiratory function testsSARS-CoV-2spirometry

Identifiers

PMID35981737
PMCPMC9539179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.